EMNE.DE vs. EUNA.DE
EMNE.DE (iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating)) are both exchange-traded funds - EMNE.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while EUNA.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMNE.DE returned 10.53%/yr vs -1.55%/yr for EUNA.DE. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMNE.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EUNA.DE.
Performance
EMNE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMNE.DE achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.81% return.
EMNE.DE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.53%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 1Y
- 1.24%
- 3Y*
- 2.20%
- 5Y*
- -1.55%
- 10Y*
- —
EMNE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNE.DE iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 10.66% | 22.18% | 9.86% | 18.79% | -12.35% | 22.75% | 1.44% | 16.09% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating) | -0.81% | 2.91% | 1.48% | 4.41% | -13.52% | -2.42% | 3.86% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMNE.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019 | 0.12 |
Over the past year, EMNE.DE and EUNA.DE have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMNE.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMNE.DE
EUNA.DE
EMNE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating) (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMNE.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.06 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 0.44 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 1.13 | +5.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMNE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMNE.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNE.DE and EUNA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMNE.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.37% | -17.81% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -2.80% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.10% | -4.11% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.70% | -17.04% | -7.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -8.91% | +6.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -6.72% | +1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 1.09% | +1.86% |
Volatility
EMNE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating) (EUNA.DE) at 0.94%. This indicates that EMNE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMNE.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 0.94% | +2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 2.89% | +9.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 3.76% | +11.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 4.84% | +11.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 4.44% | +15.55% |
EMNE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMNE.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMNE.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison
EMNE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, while EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNE.DE iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 2.37% | 2.61% | 2.95% | 3.17% | 3.34% | 2.40% | 1.85% | 2.67% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF Hedged Euro (Accumulating) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMNE.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for EMNE.DE.
EMNE.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. EMNE.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EMNE.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMNE.DE and EUNA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer