PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMNE.DE vs. EHF1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMNE.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE) and Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR (EHF1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMNE.DE having a 10.66% return and EHF1.DE slightly higher at 11.13%.


EMNE.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.33%
6M
7.66%
YTD
10.66%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*

EHF1.DE

1D
0.33%
1M
3.83%
6M
10.19%
YTD
11.13%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMNE.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMNE.DE
iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
10.66%22.18%9.86%18.79%-12.35%22.75%1.44%16.09%
EHF1.DE
Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR
11.13%19.17%9.83%14.12%1.04%18.25%-9.78%13.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EMNE.DE and EHF1.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.65

The correlation between EMNE.DE and EHF1.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMNE.DE vs. EHF1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMNE.DE
EMNE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EMNE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMNE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EHF1.DE
EHF1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EHF1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHF1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHF1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EHF1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHF1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMNE.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE) and Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR (EHF1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMNE.DEEHF1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.22

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.80

8.94

-2.14

EMNE.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMNE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the EHF1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMNE.DE and EHF1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMNE.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMNE.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, smaller than the maximum EHF1.DE drawdown of -38.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNE.DE and EHF1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMNE.DEEHF1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-38.13%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-6.24%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-12.89%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.70%

-15.64%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.07%

-0.16%

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-4.93%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.25%

+0.70%

Volatility

EMNE.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EMNE.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR (EHF1.DE) at 3.48%. This indicates that EMNE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHF1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMNE.DEEHF1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

3.48%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

8.51%

+4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

10.46%

+4.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

12.29%

+3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

14.61%

+5.38%

EMNE.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMNE.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EHF1.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EMNE.DE vs. EHF1.DE - Dividend Comparison

EMNE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, while EHF1.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EHF1.DE
Amundi MSCI Europe High Dividend Factor UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMNE.DE
iShares MSCI EMU CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.37%2.61%2.95%3.17%3.34%2.40%1.85%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMNE.DE and EHF1.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMNE.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMNE.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for EHF1.DE.

EMNE.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while EHF1.DE tracks MSCI Europe High Dividend Yield. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EMNE.DE and 0.23% for EHF1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMNE.DE and EHF1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer