EMMV.L vs. JRDM.L
EMMV.L (iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and JRDM.L (JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMMV.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index (Net) while JRDM.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMMV.L returned 11.83%/yr vs 359.37%/yr for JRDM.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMMV.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JRDM.L.
Performance
EMMV.L vs. JRDM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMMV.L is traded in USD, while JRDM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRDM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMMV.L achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than JRDM.L's 20.13% return.
EMMV.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -6.70%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 5.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.06%
JRDM.L
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- 6M
- 13.61%
- YTD
- 20.13%
- 1Y
- 198.06%
- 3Y*
- 359.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 130.39%
EMMV.L vs. JRDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMV.L iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.47% | 12.62% | 8.30% | 8.03% | -14.19% | -0.78% |
JRDM.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 20.13% | 7,405.66% | 6.70% | 6.72% | -20.81% | -29.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMMV.L and JRDM.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between EMMV.L and JRDM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMMV.L vs. JRDM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
Financial Services
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
Communication Services
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
Consumer Cyclical
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
Industrials
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
Healthcare
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
Consumer Defensive
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
Utilities
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
Energy
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
Basic Materials
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
Real Estate
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMMV.L vs. JRDM.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMMV.L
JRDM.L
EMMV.L vs. JRDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMMV.L) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMMV.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 2.38 | -1.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 15.39 | -13.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 48.38 | -43.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMMV.L vs. JRDM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMMV.L drawdown since its inception was -32.15%, smaller than the maximum JRDM.L drawdown of -52.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMMV.L and JRDM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMMV.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.15% | -52.52% | +20.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -12.79% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.41% | -16.06% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -10.07% | +2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -29.38% | +20.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 4.08% | -0.99% |
Volatility
EMMV.L vs. JRDM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMMV.L) is 6.25%, while JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that EMMV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMMV.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 9.53% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.76% | 19.58% | -5.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 117.42% | -102.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 504.88% | -491.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 504.88% | -490.81% |
EMMV.L vs. JRDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMMV.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JRDM.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMMV.L vs. JRDM.L - Dividend Comparison
EMMV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMV.L iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JRDM.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 45.93% | 171.80% | 2.24% | 2.42% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMMV.L and JRDM.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JRDM.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JRDM.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EMMV.L.
EMMV.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index (Net), while JRDM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EMMV.L and 0.30% for JRDM.L.
Find the right allocation for EMMV.L and JRDM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer