EMLP vs. AMJ
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and J.P. Morgan Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJ).
EMLP and AMJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMLP is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Jun 21, 2012. AMJ is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index. It was launched on Apr 2, 2009.
Performance
EMLP vs. AMJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMLP vs. AMJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 16.08% | 9.67% | 33.39% | 8.05% | 10.39% | 23.20% | -13.36% | 23.40% | -8.70% | 1.07% |
AMJ J.P. Morgan Alerian MLP Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.32% | 25.06% | 30.08% | 37.93% | -29.43% | 5.67% | -12.84% | -7.21% |
Returns By Period
EMLP
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 16.08%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
AMJ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMLP vs. AMJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLP has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than AMJ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMLP vs. AMJ — Risk / Return Rank
EMLP
AMJ
EMLP vs. AMJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and J.P. Morgan Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMLP | AMJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMLP | AMJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLP and AMJ is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMLP vs. AMJ - Dividend Comparison
EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, while AMJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.75% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
AMJ J.P. Morgan Alerian MLP Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 6.54% | 6.33% | 7.31% | 10.87% | 8.30% | 8.38% | 6.96% | 6.57% | 7.93% |
Drawdowns
EMLP vs. AMJ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLP | AMJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | — | — |
Volatility
EMLP vs. AMJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMLP | AMJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.72% | — | — |