EMLP.L vs. SBEM.L
EMLP.L (PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc) and SBEM.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMLP.L tracks the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD while SBEM.L tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMLP.L returned 3.99%/yr vs 4.55%/yr for SBEM.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMLP.L charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for SBEM.L.
Performance
EMLP.L vs. SBEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMLP.L is traded in GBP, while SBEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SBEM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMLP.L achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than SBEM.L's 2.48% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLP.L has underperformed SBEM.L with an annualized return of 3.99%, while SBEM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 4.55% annualized return.
EMLP.L
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 9.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.40%
- 10Y*
- 3.99%
SBEM.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 14.55%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
EMLP.L vs. SBEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc | 1.51% | 9.10% | -1.68% | 7.52% | 5.55% | -4.33% | -1.55% | 9.55% | -1.46% | 2.43% |
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 2.48% | 7.42% | 9.46% | 5.94% | -10.24% | -1.29% | 1.28% | 10.91% | 1.42% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLP.L and SBEM.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2016 | 0.65 |
The correlation between EMLP.L and SBEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMLP.L vs. SBEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMLP.L
SBEM.L
EMLP.L vs. SBEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMLP.L | SBEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 4.10 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 11.84 | -5.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMLP.L | SBEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.24 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.39 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.48 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
EMLP.L vs. SBEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum SBEM.L drawdown of -21.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLP.L and SBEM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLP.L | SBEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.02% | -21.61% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.29% | -3.53% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.90% | -9.79% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.25% | -17.20% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.12% | -21.61% | +2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | 0.00% | -2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -7.26% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 1.23% | +0.26% |
Volatility
EMLP.L vs. SBEM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L) is 1.50%, while UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that EMLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMLP.L | SBEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 1.66% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.23% | 4.58% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.40% | 6.47% | -1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.09% | 8.85% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.52% | 10.88% | -1.36% |
EMLP.L vs. SBEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLP.L has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SBEM.L's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMLP.L vs. SBEM.L - Dividend Comparison
EMLP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP.L PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 6.53% | 7.69% | 6.28% | 6.49% | 5.72% | 4.35% | 4.92% | 4.83% | 4.47% | 4.84% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMLP.L and SBEM.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SBEM.L is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBEM.L is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EMLP.L.
EMLP.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while SBEM.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EMLP.L and 0.42% for SBEM.L.
Find the right allocation for EMLP.L and SBEM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer