PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMLP.L vs. QUID.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMLP.L vs. QUID.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L) and PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMLP.L achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly higher than QUID.L's 2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLP.L has outperformed QUID.L with an annualized return of 2.96%, while QUID.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.00% annualized return.


EMLP.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.06%
6M
2.44%
YTD
3.11%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
2.96%

QUID.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.36%
6M
1.97%
YTD
2.18%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
2.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMLP.L vs. QUID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMLP.L
PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc
3.11%9.09%-1.67%7.52%5.55%-4.33%-1.55%9.56%-1.47%2.44%
QUID.L
PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF
2.18%4.89%5.67%4.95%-0.96%-0.07%0.71%1.57%0.26%0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between EMLP.L and QUID.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMLP.L vs. QUID.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMLP.L
EMLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EMLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
EMLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

QUID.L
QUID.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
QUID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
QUID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMLP.L vs. QUID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L) and PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMLP.LQUID.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

2.80

-1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

9.83

-7.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.51

78.74

-73.23

EMLP.L vs. QUID.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the QUID.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMLP.L and QUID.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMLP.L vs. QUID.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMLP.L drawdown since its inception was -53.09%, which is greater than QUID.L's maximum drawdown of -2.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLP.L and QUID.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMLP.LQUID.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.09%

-2.47%

-50.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.29%

-0.45%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.90%

-0.45%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.24%

-2.47%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.11%

-2.47%

-16.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.82%

0.00%

-13.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.91%

-0.21%

-27.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

0.06%

+1.49%

Volatility

EMLP.L vs. QUID.L - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EMLP.L) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L) at 0.19%. This indicates that EMLP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMLP.LQUID.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.19%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.22%

0.64%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.44%

0.74%

+4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.07%

0.74%

+7.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.18%

0.62%

+8.56%

Dividends

EMLP.L vs. QUID.L - Dividend Comparison

EMLP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMLP.L
PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUID.L
PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF
4.17%4.19%4.67%3.69%0.66%0.08%0.31%0.73%0.52%0.33%0.59%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMLP.L and QUID.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMLP.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while QUID.L is Global Equities. EMLP.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while QUID.L tracks PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMLP.L and QUID.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer