PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMLI.L vs. SSHY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMLI.L vs. SSHY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMLI.L is traded in USD, while SSHY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SSHY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMLI.L achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than SSHY.L's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLI.L has underperformed SSHY.L with an annualized return of 3.23%, while SSHY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 5.51% annualized return.


EMLI.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.64%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
6.38%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
3.23%

SSHY.L

1D
0.22%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.26%
6M
2.24%
1Y
7.16%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
5.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMLI.L vs. SSHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMLI.L
PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
1.64%16.62%-3.24%13.68%-5.61%-5.52%1.92%13.04%-6.89%12.58%
SSHY.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
1.26%9.05%8.33%11.07%-4.83%4.74%3.41%10.94%-0.88%5.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EMLI.L and SSHY.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014

0.23

The correlation between EMLI.L and SSHY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMLI.L vs. SSHY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMLI.L
EMLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EMLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EMLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SSHY.L
SSHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SSHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMLI.L vs. SSHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMLI.LSSHY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.77

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.23

11.73

-6.49

EMLI.L vs. SSHY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMLI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the SSHY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMLI.L and SSHY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMLI.LSSHY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.53

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.78

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.74

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.63

-0.40

Drawdowns

EMLI.L vs. SSHY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMLI.L drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, which is greater than SSHY.L's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLI.L and SSHY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMLI.LSSHY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.62%

-21.77%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-2.58%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.82%

-5.07%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.52%

-9.73%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.08%

-21.77%

+0.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-0.07%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-1.67%

-5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

0.61%

+0.98%

Volatility

EMLI.L vs. SSHY.L - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) at 1.40%. This indicates that EMLI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSHY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMLI.LSSHY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

1.40%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.40%

3.72%

+1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.49%

4.67%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.89%

6.64%

+3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.59%

7.44%

+2.15%

EMLI.L vs. SSHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMLI.L has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SSHY.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMLI.L vs. SSHY.L - Dividend Comparison

EMLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, less than SSHY.L's 7.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMLI.L
PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
6.55%5.81%6.33%5.70%5.21%4.50%3.68%5.24%5.83%5.76%6.69%7.09%
SSHY.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
7.07%7.33%7.48%6.52%4.86%4.47%5.24%5.27%5.10%5.48%4.92%5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMLI.L and SSHY.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SSHY.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSHY.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EMLI.L.

EMLI.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SSHY.L is High Yield Bonds. EMLI.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while SSHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EMLI.L and 0.55% for SSHY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMLI.L and SSHY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer