EMLC.L vs. HYGB.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

EMLC.L (VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF A USD (Acc)) and HYGB.L (VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds from VanEck - EMLC.L tracks the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index-Emerging Markets Global Core Index while HYGB.L tracks the ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMLC.L returned 1.79%/yr vs 2.83%/yr for HYGB.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMLC.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HYGB.L.

Performance

EMLC.L vs. HYGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF A USD (Acc) (EMLC.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EMLC.L is traded in USD, while HYGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HYGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMLC.L achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than HYGB.L's 3.68% return.

EMLC.L

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.17%
• 6M: 0.80%
• YTD: 1.34%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: 5.39%
• 5Y*: 1.79%
• 10Y*: —

HYGB.L

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.78%
• 6M: 3.05%
• YTD: 3.68%
• 1Y: 8.03%
• 3Y*: 10.31%
• 5Y*: 2.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMLC.L vs. HYGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMLC.L VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF A USD (Acc)	1.34%	17.98%	-2.29%	10.29%	-9.98%	-9.75%	2.70%	9.54%	-10.44%
HYGB.L VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	3.68%	9.22%	11.83%	7.02%	-12.94%	-0.32%	5.02%	15.45%	-30.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EMLC.L and HYGB.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018	0.18

The correlation between EMLC.L and HYGB.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EMLC.L vs. HYGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMLC.L

EMLC.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
EMLC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
EMLC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
EMLC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 35
EMLC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EMLC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 35

HYGB.L

HYGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 48
HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
HYGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
HYGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 42
HYGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
HYGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMLC.L vs. HYGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF A USD (Acc) (EMLC.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMLC.L	HYGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	1.50	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	2.11	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.29	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	2.75	-1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.94	12.04	-8.11

EMLC.L vs. HYGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMLC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMLC.L and HYGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMLC.L vs. HYGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMLC.L drawdown since its inception was -26.61%, smaller than the maximum HYGB.L drawdown of -37.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLC.L and HYGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMLC.L	HYGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.61%	-37.51%	+10.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.06%	-2.91%	-3.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.69%	-4.72%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.38%	-25.04%	+1.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	-3.40%	+1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.15%	-21.18%	+12.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	0.67%	+1.24%

Volatility

EMLC.L vs. HYGB.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF A USD (Acc) (EMLC.L) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L) at 1.31%. This indicates that EMLC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMLC.L	HYGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.94%	1.31%	+0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.26%	4.67%	+1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.31%	5.35%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.37%	17.85%	-9.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.23%	17.17%	-7.94%

EMLC.L vs. HYGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMLC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMLC.L vs. HYGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMLC.L nor HYGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EMLC.L VanEck J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF A USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.20%
HYGB.L VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMLC.L and HYGB.L in my portfolio?

EMLC.L and HYGB.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMLC.L or HYGB.L?

On fees, EMLC.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMLC.L or HYGB.L?

EMLC.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYGB.L.

What is the main difference between EMLC.L and HYGB.L?

EMLC.L tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index-Emerging Markets Global Core Index, while HYGB.L tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EMLC.L and 0.40% for HYGB.L.