EMLB.L vs. SSHY.L
EMLB.L (PIMCO Advantage Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SSHY.L (PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - EMLB.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Currency Bond Index, while SSHY.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMLB.L returned 3.11%/yr vs 5.35%/yr for SSHY.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMLB.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for SSHY.L.
Performance
EMLB.L vs. SSHY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMLB.L is traded in USD, while SSHY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SSHY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMLB.L achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly higher than SSHY.L's 1.96% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLB.L has underperformed SSHY.L with an annualized return of 3.11%, while SSHY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 5.35% annualized return.
EMLB.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 8.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 3.11%
SSHY.L
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 6.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 5.35%
EMLB.L vs. SSHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLB.L PIMCO Advantage Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.92% | 17.08% | -3.25% | 13.74% | -5.70% | -5.53% | 1.91% | 13.10% | -6.90% | 12.55% |
SSHY.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 1.96% | 9.05% | 8.34% | 11.06% | -4.83% | 4.75% | 3.40% | 10.94% | -0.89% | 5.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLB.L and SSHY.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2012 | 0.20 |
The correlation between EMLB.L and SSHY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMLB.L vs. SSHY.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMLB.L
SSHY.L
EMLB.L vs. SSHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Advantage Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMLB.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMLB.L | SSHY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.55 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 10.70 | -5.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMLB.L vs. SSHY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLB.L drawdown since its inception was -29.75%, smaller than the maximum SSHY.L drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLB.L and SSHY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLB.L | SSHY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.75% | -41.58% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.48% | -2.58% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.50% | -5.07% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.09% | -9.73% | -10.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.37% | -21.77% | +0.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -0.11% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.33% | -18.92% | +9.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 0.62% | +1.06% |
Volatility
EMLB.L vs. SSHY.L - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Advantage Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMLB.L) has a higher volatility of 2.03% compared to PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) at 1.55%. This indicates that EMLB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSHY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMLB.L | SSHY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 1.55% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.19% | 3.92% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.00% | 4.87% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.48% | 6.66% | +2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.58% | 7.40% | +2.18% |
EMLB.L vs. SSHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLB.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SSHY.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMLB.L vs. SSHY.L - Dividend Comparison
EMLB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLB.L PIMCO Advantage Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSHY.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist | 7.01% | 7.33% | 7.48% | 6.52% | 4.86% | 4.47% | 5.24% | 5.27% | 5.10% | 5.48% | 4.92% | 5.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMLB.L and SSHY.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMLB.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMLB.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SSHY.L.
EMLB.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SSHY.L is High Yield Bonds. EMLB.L tracks PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Currency Bond Index, while SSHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMLB.L and 0.55% for SSHY.L.
Find the right allocation for EMLB.L and SSHY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer