EMIG.L vs. LEMB.L
EMIG.L (UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and LEMB.L (Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, from UBS and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMIG.L returned 0.89%/yr vs 2.25%/yr for LEMB.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMIG.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LEMB.L.
Performance
EMIG.L vs. LEMB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMIG.L is traded in GBp, while LEMB.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LEMB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMIG.L achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than LEMB.L's 2.21% return.
EMIG.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- 1Y
- 7.08%
- 3Y*
- 2.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- —
LEMB.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- 2.95%
EMIG.L vs. LEMB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIG.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.13% | 1.96% | 3.34% | 0.56% | -7.44% | -0.84% | 5.09% | -5.65% |
LEMB.L Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.21% | 4.47% | 2.42% | 3.79% | -6.69% | -1.30% | 1.22% | -8.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMIG.L and LEMB.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between EMIG.L and LEMB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMIG.L vs. LEMB.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMIG.L
LEMB.L
EMIG.L vs. LEMB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EMIG.L) and Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMIG.L | LEMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 2.55 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 7.62 | -4.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMIG.L | LEMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.75 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.23 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.37 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
EMIG.L vs. LEMB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMIG.L drawdown since its inception was -17.02%, smaller than the maximum LEMB.L drawdown of -23.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIG.L and LEMB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMIG.L | LEMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -23.69% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.03% | -4.62% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.09% | -8.77% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.52% | -13.94% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.24% | -4.12% | -3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -10.59% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.55% | +0.59% |
Volatility
EMIG.L vs. LEMB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EMIG.L) is 1.49%, while Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist (LEMB.L) has a volatility of 2.04%. This indicates that EMIG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEMB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMIG.L | LEMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 2.04% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.31% | 5.39% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.82% | 6.73% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.28% | 9.72% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.47% | 12.02% | -2.55% |
EMIG.L vs. LEMB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMIG.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LEMB.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMIG.L vs. LEMB.L - Dividend Comparison
EMIG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LEMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIG.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LEMB.L Lyxor iBoxx USD Liquid Emerging Markets Sovereigns UCITS ETF - Dist | 5.20% | 5.29% | 3.59% | 5.90% | 5.73% | 4.49% | 4.12% | 5.12% | 5.18% | 5.14% | 5.41% | 6.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMIG.L and LEMB.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LEMB.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LEMB.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EMIG.L.
Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EMIG.L and 0.30% for LEMB.L.
Find the right allocation for EMIG.L and LEMB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer