EMIG.L vs. EUFM.L
EMIG.L (UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and EUFM.L (UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EMIG.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while EUFM.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMIG.L returned 0.89%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for EUFM.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMIG.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for EUFM.L.
Performance
EMIG.L vs. EUFM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMIG.L achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than EUFM.L's 6.74% return.
EMIG.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- 1Y
- 7.08%
- 3Y*
- 2.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- —
EUFM.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
EMIG.L vs. EUFM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIG.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.13% | 1.96% | 3.34% | 0.56% | -7.44% | -0.84% | 5.09% | -5.65% |
EUFM.L UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc | 6.74% | 29.59% | 3.25% | 15.45% | -7.82% | 13.50% | 5.84% | 1.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMIG.L and EUFM.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2019 | 0.11 |
The correlation between EMIG.L and EUFM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (5 years) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMIG.L vs. EUFM.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMIG.L
EUFM.L
EMIG.L vs. EUFM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EMIG.L) and UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMIG.L | EUFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.58 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 5.69 | -2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMIG.L | EUFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.67 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.53 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
EMIG.L vs. EUFM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMIG.L drawdown since its inception was -17.02%, smaller than the maximum EUFM.L drawdown of -30.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIG.L and EUFM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMIG.L | EUFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -30.14% | +13.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.03% | -10.59% | +5.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.09% | -11.90% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.52% | -20.86% | +6.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.24% | -1.07% | -6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -5.19% | -4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 2.95% | -0.81% |
Volatility
EMIG.L vs. EUFM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EMIG.L) is 1.49%, while UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that EMIG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUFM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMIG.L | EUFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 4.00% | -2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.31% | 10.33% | -6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.82% | 12.33% | -6.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.28% | 14.53% | -6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.47% | 16.13% | -6.66% |
EMIG.L vs. EUFM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMIG.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EUFM.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMIG.L vs. EUFM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMIG.L nor EUFM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMIG.L and EUFM.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUFM.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUFM.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EMIG.L.
EMIG.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while EUFM.L is Europe Equities. EMIG.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while EUFM.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EMIG.L and 0.34% for EUFM.L.
Find the right allocation for EMIG.L and EUFM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer