PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMIG.DE vs. SYBM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMIG.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EMIG.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SYBM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMIG.DE achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than SYBM.DE's 0.49% return.


EMIG.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
0.97%
YTD
1.49%
6M
0.73%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
2.05%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*

SYBM.DE

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.42%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
2.54%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
1.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMIG.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMIG.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
1.49%-2.91%7.57%2.80%-12.35%6.34%-1.01%2.63%
SYBM.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF
0.49%2.47%3.13%5.78%-4.57%-0.95%-5.71%3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between EMIG.DE and SYBM.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2019

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMIG.DE vs. SYBM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMIG.DE
EMIG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EMIG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SYBM.DE
SYBM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SYBM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMIG.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EMIG.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SYBM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMIG.DESYBM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.12

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

0.87

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.38

2.69

-2.31

EMIG.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMIG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the SYBM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMIG.DE and SYBM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMIG.DESYBM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

0.67

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.21

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.23

-0.20

Drawdowns

EMIG.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMIG.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.46%, smaller than the maximum SYBM.DE drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIG.DE and SYBM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMIG.DESYBM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.46%

-19.16%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.16%

-3.90%

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.16%

-7.62%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.16%

-8.64%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.38%

-3.09%

-10.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-7.10%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.99%

1.26%

+9.73%

Volatility

EMIG.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EMIG.DE) is 1.01%, while SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SYBM.DE) has a volatility of 1.51%. This indicates that EMIG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SYBM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMIG.DESYBM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

1.51%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.57%

4.22%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.95%

5.07%

+16.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.46%

6.94%

+5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.21%

7.82%

+4.39%

EMIG.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMIG.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SYBM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMIG.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Dividend Comparison

EMIG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SYBM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMIG.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYBM.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF
5.07%5.01%4.77%4.21%4.29%3.89%4.12%4.34%4.13%5.01%4.30%5.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMIG.DE and SYBM.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMIG.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMIG.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SYBM.DE.

EMIG.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while SYBM.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond. They also come from different issuers: UBS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EMIG.DE and 0.55% for SYBM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMIG.DE and SYBM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer