EMID.L vs. LDEG.L
EMID.L (iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF) and LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EMID.L tracks the MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR while LDEG.L tracks the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMID.L returned 7.51%/yr vs 16.02%/yr for LDEG.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMID.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LDEG.L.
Performance
EMID.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMID.L is traded in EUR, while LDEG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LDEG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMID.L achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 11.39% return.
EMID.L
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 15.92%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- —
LDEG.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- 23.74%
- 5Y*
- 16.02%
- 10Y*
- —
EMID.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMID.L iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF | 7.96% | 22.78% | 9.31% | 14.05% | -18.34% | 8.45% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 11.39% | 37.36% | 14.08% | 16.74% | -0.87% | 5.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMID.L and LDEG.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.72 |
The correlation between EMID.L and LDEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EMID.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMID.L
LDEG.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
Technology
Industrials
EMID.L
LDEG.L
Financial Services
EMID.L
LDEG.L
Healthcare
EMID.L
LDEG.L
Consumer Defensive
EMID.L
LDEG.L
Consumer Cyclical
EMID.L
LDEG.L
Communication Services
EMID.L
LDEG.L
Basic Materials
EMID.L
LDEG.L
Utilities
EMID.L
LDEG.L
Real Estate
EMID.L
LDEG.L
-
Energy
EMID.L
LDEG.L
Technology
EMID.L
LDEG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMID.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMID.L
LDEG.L
EMID.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF (EMID.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMID.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.42 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 3.90 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 13.75 | -6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMID.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 2.32 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 1.25 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 1.26 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
EMID.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMID.L drawdown since its inception was -37.57%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -19.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMID.L and LDEG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMID.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.57% | -19.76% | -17.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.39% | -6.92% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.04% | -13.74% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | -19.76% | -9.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -1.36% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -2.97% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 1.97% | +0.28% |
Volatility
EMID.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF (EMID.L) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 3.53%. This indicates that EMID.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMID.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 3.53% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 9.10% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 11.65% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 15.82% | -0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 15.81% | +0.47% |
EMID.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMID.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMID.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison
EMID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than LDEG.L's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMID.L iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF | 2.57% | 2.78% | 2.75% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 1.78% | 1.39% | 2.33% | 2.84% | 0.48% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 3.43% | 4.21% | 4.11% | 3.70% | 3.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMID.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMID.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMID.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.
EMID.L tracks MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMID.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.
Find the right allocation for EMID.L and LDEG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer