PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EMID.L vs. IEDL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EMID.L vs. IEDL.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EMID.L (iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF) and IEDL.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - EMID.L tracks the MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR while IEDL.L tracks the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMID.L returned 7.51%/yr vs 14.46%/yr for IEDL.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMID.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IEDL.L.

Performance

EMID.L vs. IEDL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF (EMID.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMID.L achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than IEDL.L's 14.02% return.

EMID.L

1D
0.28%
1M
1.54%
YTD
7.96%
6M
10.75%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
—

IEDL.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.62%
YTD
14.02%
6M
16.99%
1Y
32.74%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMID.L vs. IEDL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMID.L
iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF		7.96%22.78%9.31%14.05%-18.34%21.37%4.10%29.56%-12.33%
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		14.02%35.00%10.46%13.50%-3.75%26.71%-8.76%21.78%-12.14%

Correlation

The correlation between EMID.L and IEDL.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.87

The correlation between EMID.L and IEDL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMID.L vs. IEDL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EMID.L
IEDL.L

Industrials

26.4%
17.0%

Financial Services

21.4%
22.6%

Healthcare

8.0%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
6.2%

Communication Services

6.7%
3.7%

Basic Materials

6.2%
6.2%

Utilities

6.0%
4.5%

Real Estate

3.9%
0.6%

Energy

3.7%
5.1%

Technology

3.1%
12.2%

Industrials

EMID.L
26.4%
IEDL.L
17.0%

Financial Services

EMID.L
21.4%
IEDL.L
22.6%

Healthcare

EMID.L
8.0%
IEDL.L
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

EMID.L
7.3%
IEDL.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EMID.L
7.2%
IEDL.L
6.2%

Communication Services

EMID.L
6.7%
IEDL.L
3.7%

Basic Materials

EMID.L
6.2%
IEDL.L
6.2%

Utilities

EMID.L
6.0%
IEDL.L
4.5%

Real Estate

EMID.L
3.9%
IEDL.L
0.6%

Energy

EMID.L
3.7%
IEDL.L
5.1%

Technology

EMID.L
3.1%
IEDL.L
12.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)

Often compared with EMID.L:
EMID.L vs. ZPDX.DEEMID.L vs. IMV.LEMID.L vs. LCPE.LEMID.L vs. EEIP.LEMID.L vs. EQDS.LEMID.L vs. EEI.LEMID.L vs. ISAC.L
Often compared with IEDL.L:
IEDL.L vs. S7XP.LIEDL.L vs. XHYG.DEIEDL.L vs. MVEW.DEIEDL.L vs. T3KE.DEIEDL.L vs. EUMD.LIEDL.L vs. CNX1.LIEDL.L vs. VEUR.L

Return for Risk

EMID.L vs. IEDL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EMID.L
EMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
IEDL.L
IEDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMID.L vs. IEDL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF (EMID.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EMID.LIEDL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.35
2.40

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.90
3.27

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.44

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.36

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.07

12.50

-5.43

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMID.L vs. IEDL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMID.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMID.L and IEDL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EMID.LIEDL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.40

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.94

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.59

-0.10

Drawdowns

EMID.L vs. IEDL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMID.L drawdown since its inception was -37.57%, smaller than the maximum IEDL.L drawdown of -39.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMID.L and IEDL.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EMID.LIEDL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.57%

-39.74%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-9.70%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.04%

-17.52%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

-19.57%

-9.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.75%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-6.19%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.61%

-0.36%

Volatility

EMID.L vs. IEDL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF (EMID.L) is 3.95%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that EMID.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEDL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EMID.LIEDL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

4.76%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

10.95%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

13.60%

-1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

15.42%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

17.97%

-1.69%

EMID.L vs. IEDL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMID.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IEDL.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EMID.L vs. IEDL.L - Dividend Comparison

EMID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than IEDL.L's 3.01% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMID.L
iShares MSCI Europe Mid Cap UCITS ETF		2.57%2.78%2.75%2.42%2.61%1.78%1.39%2.33%2.84%0.48%
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		3.01%3.44%4.22%4.76%4.23%3.56%2.32%3.86%3.19%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EMID.L and IEDL.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMID.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMID.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEDL.L.

EMID.L tracks MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR, while IEDL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMID.L and 0.25% for IEDL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMID.L and IEDL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer