EMHG.L vs. SWDA.L
EMHG.L (iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EMHG.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global Diversified Core, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMHG.L returned 0.93%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for SWDA.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMHG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
EMHG.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMHG.L is traded in GBP, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMHG.L achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 9.95% return.
EMHG.L
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- 8.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
EMHG.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHG.L iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.82% | 13.40% | 5.31% | 8.97% | -19.93% | -2.50% | 3.49% | 13.78% | -3.63% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.95% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 12.25% | 23.03% | -0.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMHG.L and SWDA.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2018 | 0.39 |
The correlation between EMHG.L and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMHG.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMHG.L
SWDA.L
EMHG.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (EMHG.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMHG.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.20 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 12.47 | -3.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMHG.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMHG.L drawdown since its inception was -29.64%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -41.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHG.L and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMHG.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.64% | -41.70% | +12.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.44% | -6.55% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.62% | -18.50% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -18.50% | -11.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -1.05% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -9.44% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 1.69% | -0.60% |
Volatility
EMHG.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (EMHG.L) is 1.37%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 2.61%. This indicates that EMHG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMHG.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 2.61% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.88% | 7.86% | -2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.90% | 10.57% | -4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.00% | 13.36% | -4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.02% | 14.50% | -4.48% |
EMHG.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMHG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMHG.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
EMHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHG.L iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 6.17% | 5.71% | 5.74% | 5.61% | 5.64% | 3.93% | 3.85% | 4.73% | 3.64% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMHG.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMHG.L.
EMHG.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. EMHG.L tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global Diversified Core, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMHG.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for EMHG.L and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer