PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMHC vs. JPMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMHC vs. JPMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMHC having a 1.57% return and JPMB slightly higher at 1.60%.


EMHC

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.13%
YTD
1.57%
6M
1.74%
1Y
11.54%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*

JPMB

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.30%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.55%
1Y
11.48%
3Y*
7.93%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMHC vs. JPMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EMHC
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF
1.57%14.07%3.52%10.06%-17.75%1.68%
JPMB
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF
1.60%13.73%1.46%9.48%-16.05%2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EMHC and JPMB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021

0.95

The correlation between EMHC and JPMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMHC vs. JPMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMHC
JPMB

Financial Services

100.0%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

EMHC
100.0%
JPMB
1.4%

Basic Materials

EMHC

-

JPMB

-

Communication Services

EMHC

-

JPMB

-

Consumer Cyclical

EMHC

-

JPMB

-

Consumer Defensive

EMHC

-

JPMB

-

Energy

EMHC

-

JPMB

-

Healthcare

EMHC

-

JPMB

-

Industrials

EMHC

-

JPMB

-

Real Estate

EMHC

-

JPMB

-

Technology

EMHC

-

JPMB

-

Utilities

EMHC

-

JPMB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMHC vs. JPMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMHC
EMHC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EMHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMHC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EMHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMHC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

JPMB
JPMB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JPMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPMB Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JPMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMHC vs. JPMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMHCJPMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.50

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

10.66

+0.42

EMHC vs. JPMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMHC Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the JPMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMHC and JPMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMHCJPMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.18

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.16

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.28

-0.06

Drawdowns

EMHC vs. JPMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMHC drawdown since its inception was -28.03%, which is greater than JPMB's maximum drawdown of -26.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHC and JPMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMHCJPMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.03%

-26.33%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.37%

-4.61%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.67%

-7.53%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

-26.16%

-1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.38%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.91%

-7.06%

-2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.08%

-0.04%

Volatility

EMHC vs. JPMB - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB) have volatilities of 1.89% and 1.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMHCJPMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

1.90%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

4.37%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43%

5.29%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.06%

8.94%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.96%

9.65%

-0.69%

EMHC vs. JPMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMHC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than JPMB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMHC vs. JPMB - Dividend Comparison

EMHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than JPMB's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EMHC
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF
6.11%6.16%5.95%5.12%5.11%2.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JPMB
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF
5.80%6.71%6.32%5.99%4.94%4.29%4.29%4.51%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EMHC and JPMB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JPMB has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to EMHC (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMHC dropped -28.03% vs JPMB's -26.33%.

On 5-year performance, EMHC leads with 1.55% vs 1.42% for JPMB. On fees, EMHC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMHC has performed better with a 1.55% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMHC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JPMB.

EMHC has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 5.80% for JPMB.

EMHC tracks Bloomberg Emerging USD Bond Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while JPMB tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for EMHC and 0.39% for JPMB.

JPMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMHC and JPMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer