EMHC vs. JPMB
EMHC (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF) and JPMB (JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMHC tracks the Bloomberg Emerging USD Bond Core Index - Benchmark TR Net while JPMB tracks the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMHC returned 1.55%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for JPMB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMHC charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for JPMB.
Performance
EMHC vs. JPMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMHC having a 1.57% return and JPMB slightly higher at 1.60%.
EMHC
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- —
JPMB
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 11.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.93%
- 5Y*
- 1.42%
- 10Y*
- —
EMHC vs. JPMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 1.57% | 14.07% | 3.52% | 10.06% | -17.75% | 1.68% |
JPMB JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF | 1.60% | 13.73% | 1.46% | 9.48% | -16.05% | 2.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMHC and JPMB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between EMHC and JPMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMHC vs. JPMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMHC
JPMB
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
EMHC
JPMB
Basic Materials
EMHC
-
JPMB
-
Communication Services
EMHC
-
JPMB
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMHC
-
JPMB
-
Consumer Defensive
EMHC
-
JPMB
-
Energy
EMHC
-
JPMB
-
Healthcare
EMHC
-
JPMB
-
Industrials
EMHC
-
JPMB
-
Real Estate
EMHC
-
JPMB
-
Technology
EMHC
-
JPMB
-
Utilities
EMHC
-
JPMB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMHC vs. JPMB — Risk / Return Rank
EMHC
JPMB
EMHC vs. JPMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMHC | JPMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.43 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 2.50 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.09 | 10.66 | +0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMHC | JPMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.18 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.16 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.28 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
EMHC vs. JPMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMHC drawdown since its inception was -28.03%, which is greater than JPMB's maximum drawdown of -26.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHC and JPMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMHC | JPMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.03% | -26.33% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.37% | -4.61% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.67% | -7.53% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.03% | -26.16% | -1.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.38% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.91% | -7.06% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 1.08% | -0.04% |
Volatility
EMHC vs. JPMB - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB) have volatilities of 1.89% and 1.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMHC | JPMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 1.90% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.16% | 4.37% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.43% | 5.29% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.06% | 8.94% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.96% | 9.65% | -0.69% |
EMHC vs. JPMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMHC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than JPMB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMHC vs. JPMB - Dividend Comparison
EMHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than JPMB's 5.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 6.11% | 6.16% | 5.95% | 5.12% | 5.11% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPMB JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF | 5.80% | 6.71% | 6.32% | 5.99% | 4.94% | 4.29% | 4.29% | 4.51% | 4.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, EMHC and JPMB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JPMB has higher volatility (1.90%) compared to EMHC (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMHC dropped -28.03% vs JPMB's -26.33%.
On 5-year performance, EMHC leads with 1.55% vs 1.42% for JPMB. On fees, EMHC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMHC has performed better with a 1.55% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMHC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JPMB.
EMHC has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 5.80% for JPMB.
EMHC tracks Bloomberg Emerging USD Bond Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while JPMB tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for EMHC and 0.39% for JPMB.
JPMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMHC and JPMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer