EMGAX vs. TEQLX
EMGAX (Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and TEQLX (TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, EMGAX returned 9.82%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for TEQLX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMGAX charges 1.43%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TEQLX.
Performance
EMGAX vs. TEQLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMGAX achieves a 27.13% return, which is significantly lower than TEQLX's 30.56% return. Over the past 10 years, EMGAX has underperformed TEQLX with an annualized return of 9.82%, while TEQLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.82% annualized return.
EMGAX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 27.13%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 51.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
TEQLX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 8.01%
- YTD
- 30.56%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- 55.96%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
EMGAX vs. TEQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGAX Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 27.13% | 36.30% | 3.38% | 8.37% | -19.74% | -12.13% | 20.86% | 27.57% | -16.09% | 36.26% |
TEQLX TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund | 30.56% | 34.10% | 6.71% | 9.23% | -20.22% | -3.07% | 17.67% | 18.59% | -14.60% | 37.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMGAX and TEQLX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2010 | 0.94 |
The correlation between EMGAX and TEQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMGAX vs. TEQLX — Risk / Return Rank
EMGAX
TEQLX
EMGAX vs. TEQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMGAX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMGAX | TEQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.53 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 4.27 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.31 | 16.04 | -2.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMGAX vs. TEQLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMGAX drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than TEQLX's maximum drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGAX and TEQLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMGAX | TEQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.83% | -39.33% | -22.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -13.32% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.20% | -15.97% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.48% | -36.96% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.89% | -39.33% | -6.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | 0.00% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -14.57% | -2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 3.53% | +0.31% |
Volatility
EMGAX vs. TEQLX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMGAX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) have volatilities of 10.68% and 10.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMGAX | TEQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 10.64% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.45% | 18.08% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.78% | 20.24% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 17.49% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 17.90% | +0.52% |
EMGAX vs. TEQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMGAX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than TEQLX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMGAX vs. TEQLX - Dividend Comparison
EMGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than TEQLX's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGAX Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.42% | 1.80% | 1.06% | 0.92% | 0.78% | 0.24% | 0.06% | 0.67% | 0.36% | 1.49% | 0.67% | 0.59% |
TEQLX TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund | 2.17% | 2.83% | 2.93% | 3.08% | 2.51% | 2.27% | 2.04% | 2.77% | 2.43% | 1.98% | 1.88% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMGAX and TEQLX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMGAX has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to TEQLX (10.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMGAX dropped -61.83% vs TEQLX's -39.33%.
TEQLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMGAX and TEQLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer