PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMGAX vs. SENAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMGAX vs. SENAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMGAX) and Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund (SENAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMGAX achieves a 26.23% return, which is significantly higher than SENAX's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, EMGAX has underperformed SENAX with an annualized return of 9.59%, while SENAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.46% annualized return.


EMGAX

1D
2.26%
1M
11.89%
YTD
26.23%
6M
28.88%
1Y
53.44%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
9.59%

SENAX

1D
0.71%
1M
3.02%
YTD
7.33%
6M
5.81%
1Y
15.32%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
2.12%
10Y*
11.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMGAX vs. SENAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMGAX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund
26.23%36.30%3.38%8.37%-19.74%-12.13%20.86%27.57%-16.09%36.26%
SENAX
Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund
7.33%13.41%19.25%24.00%-41.92%2.58%57.96%40.64%-5.97%28.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EMGAX and SENAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.64

The correlation between EMGAX and SENAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMGAX vs. SENAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMGAX
EMGAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EMGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SENAX
SENAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SENAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SENAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SENAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SENAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SENAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMGAX vs. SENAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMGAX) and Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund (SENAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMGAXSENAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.18

0.85

+2.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.01

1.30

+2.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.15

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

1.27

+2.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.58

4.43

+10.16

EMGAX vs. SENAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMGAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the SENAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMGAX and SENAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMGAXSENAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

0.85

+2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.07

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.45

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.30

+0.07

Drawdowns

EMGAX vs. SENAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMGAX drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than SENAX's maximum drawdown of -58.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGAX and SENAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMGAXSENAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.83%

-58.34%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.59%

-13.59%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.20%

-27.44%

+12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.48%

-55.14%

+11.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.89%

-55.14%

+9.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-13.41%

+13.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-17.71%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

3.88%

-0.23%

Volatility

EMGAX vs. SENAX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMGAX) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund (SENAX) at 5.41%. This indicates that EMGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMGAXSENAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

5.41%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.50%

15.40%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.29%

19.11%

-1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

28.79%

-10.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

25.83%

-7.64%

EMGAX vs. SENAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMGAX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SENAX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMGAX vs. SENAX - Dividend Comparison

EMGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than SENAX's 11.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMGAX
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.43%1.80%1.06%0.92%0.78%0.24%0.06%0.67%0.36%1.49%0.67%0.59%
SENAX
Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund
11.24%12.06%10.88%2.46%0.00%17.81%9.16%6.59%15.14%11.23%4.58%8.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMGAX and SENAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMGAX has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to SENAX (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMGAX dropped -61.83% vs SENAX's -58.34%.

EMGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMGAX and SENAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer