EMGAX vs. EAEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMGAX) and Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX).
EMGAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Sep 5, 1994. EAEMX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jun 29, 2006.
Performance
EMGAX vs. EAEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMGAX vs. EAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGAX Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 0.96% | 36.30% | 3.38% | 8.37% | -19.74% | -12.13% | 20.86% | 27.57% | -16.09% | 36.26% |
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund | 2.89% | 27.16% | 5.39% | 9.46% | -11.27% | 4.19% | 2.65% | 12.32% | -14.02% | 27.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMGAX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than EAEMX's 2.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EMGAX has outperformed EAEMX with an annualized return of 7.34%, while EAEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.23% annualized return.
EMGAX
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -9.62%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 4.62%
- 1Y
- 30.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
EAEMX
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- 1Y
- 26.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 6.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMGAX vs. EAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMGAX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is lower than EAEMX's 1.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMGAX vs. EAEMX — Risk / Return Rank
EMGAX
EAEMX
EMGAX vs. EAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMGAX) and Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMGAX | EAEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 2.25 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 2.86 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.68 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.68 | 10.25 | -1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMGAX | EAEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 2.25 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.56 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.47 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.28 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMGAX and EAEMX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMGAX vs. EAEMX - Dividend Comparison
EMGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than EAEMX's 2.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGAX Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 1.79% | 1.80% | 1.06% | 0.92% | 0.78% | 0.24% | 0.06% | 0.67% | 0.36% | 1.49% | 0.67% | 0.59% |
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund | 2.75% | 2.83% | 3.00% | 2.71% | 4.40% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 2.48% | 2.14% | 2.31% | 1.52% | 1.68% |
Drawdowns
EMGAX vs. EAEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMGAX drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, roughly equal to the maximum EAEMX drawdown of -62.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGAX and EAEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMGAX | EAEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.83% | -62.70% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -9.90% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.48% | -25.43% | -18.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.89% | -44.16% | -1.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.73% | -8.20% | -3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.28% | -13.58% | -3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 2.59% | +0.96% |
Volatility
EMGAX vs. EAEMX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMGAX) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) at 5.94%. This indicates that EMGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMGAX | EAEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.61% | 5.94% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 8.80% | +4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 12.17% | +5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 11.42% | +6.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 13.38% | +4.63% |