PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMFIX vs. TEQLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMFIX vs. TEQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMFIX achieves a 31.86% return, which is significantly higher than TEQLX's 29.20% return. Over the past 10 years, EMFIX has outperformed TEQLX with an annualized return of 14.00%, while TEQLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.56% annualized return.


EMFIX

1D
0.54%
1M
8.80%
YTD
31.86%
6M
35.28%
1Y
63.44%
3Y*
26.15%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
14.00%

TEQLX

1D
-0.71%
1M
8.36%
YTD
29.20%
6M
32.06%
1Y
56.15%
3Y*
24.65%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMFIX vs. TEQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMFIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund
31.86%35.16%7.08%9.68%-26.09%4.05%30.00%30.47%-16.96%46.16%
TEQLX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
29.20%34.10%6.71%9.23%-20.22%-3.07%17.67%18.59%-14.60%37.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EMFIX and TEQLX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2011

0.93

The correlation between EMFIX and TEQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMFIX vs. TEQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMFIX
EMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
EMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

TEQLX
TEQLX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TEQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TEQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMFIX vs. TEQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMFIXTEQLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.60

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

4.40

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.11

17.41

+0.70

EMFIX vs. TEQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMFIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.51, which is comparable to the TEQLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMFIX and TEQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMFIXTEQLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51

3.26

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.45

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.60

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.35

-0.01

Drawdowns

EMFIX vs. TEQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMFIX drawdown since its inception was -44.99%, which is greater than TEQLX's maximum drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMFIX and TEQLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMFIXTEQLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.99%

-39.33%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.20%

-13.32%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-15.97%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.41%

-37.05%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.54%

-39.33%

-4.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.71%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.94%

-14.60%

-2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

3.35%

+0.17%

Volatility

EMFIX vs. TEQLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX) is 7.32%, while TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that EMFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMFIXTEQLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

7.82%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.10%

15.45%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.20%

17.99%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

16.98%

+1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

17.68%

+1.99%

EMFIX vs. TEQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMFIX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than TEQLX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMFIX vs. TEQLX - Dividend Comparison

EMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than TEQLX's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMFIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.25%1.65%0.61%1.25%0.82%22.32%2.32%2.16%0.82%2.12%1.00%0.00%
TEQLX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
2.19%2.83%2.93%3.08%2.51%2.27%2.04%2.77%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, EMFIX and TEQLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TEQLX has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to EMFIX (7.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMFIX dropped -44.99% vs TEQLX's -39.33%.

EMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 3.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMFIX and TEQLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer