EMFIX vs. ELBIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EMFIX (Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund) and ELBIX (Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - EMFIX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Ashmore, while ELBIX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Ashmore. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EMFIX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ELBIX.

Performance

EMFIX vs. ELBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (ELBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EMFIX

• 1D: 2.99%
• 1M: -2.28%
• 6M: 12.83%
• YTD: 23.37%
• 1Y: 47.42%
• 3Y*: 20.47%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 12.68%
• ALL TIME*: 6.17%

ELBIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

EMFIX vs. ELBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund	23.37%	35.16%	7.08%	9.68%	-26.09%	4.05%	30.00%	30.47%	-16.96%	46.16%
ELBIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund	0.24%	19.17%	-4.30%	14.03%	-10.00%	-9.55%	2.65%	12.11%	-7.02%	13.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EMFIX and ELBIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2011	0.57

The correlation between EMFIX and ELBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EMFIX vs. ELBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMFIX

EMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 81
EMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
EMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

ELBIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMFIX vs. ELBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (ELBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMFIX	ELBIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.38	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EMFIX	ELBIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.83%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.81%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMFIX	ELBIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.81%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.24%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.65%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.91%	—	—

EMFIX vs. ELBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMFIX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than ELBIX's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMFIX vs. ELBIX - Dividend Comparison

EMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than ELBIX's 6.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ELBIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund	6.68%	8.01%	4.10%	4.23%	1.39%	0.00%	1.20%	0.65%	2.54%	1.96%	0.00%
EMFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund	1.32%	1.65%	0.61%	1.25%	0.82%	22.32%	2.32%	2.16%	0.82%	2.12%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMFIX and ELBIX in my portfolio?

EMFIX and ELBIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.