PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMFI vs. NEMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMFI vs. NEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pictet Emerging Markets Debt ETF (EMFI) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EMFI

1D
0.30%
1M
0.93%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NEMD

1D
0.12%
1M
0.77%
6M
4.46%
YTD
4.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMFI vs. NEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMFI and NEMD is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMFI vs. NEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pictet Emerging Markets Debt ETF (EMFI) and Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Hard Currency ETF (NEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EMFI vs. NEMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMFI vs. NEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMFI drawdown since its inception was -1.84%, smaller than the maximum NEMD drawdown of -4.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMFI and NEMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMFINEMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-4.43%

+2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.31%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-0.56%

+0.05%

Volatility

EMFI vs. NEMD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMFINEMDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.40%

6.56%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

6.56%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.40%

6.56%

-0.16%

EMFI vs. NEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMFI has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NEMD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMFI vs. NEMD - Dividend Comparison

EMFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than NEMD's 5.21% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, EMFI and NEMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EMFI is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMFI is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NEMD.

NEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.21%, compared with 0.90% for EMFI.

They also come from different issuers: Pictet and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMFI and 0.60% for NEMD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMFI and NEMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer