EMES vs. FTHF
EMES (Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF) and FTHF (First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. EMES is actively managed, while FTHF is passively managed. Over the past year, EMES returned 46.81% vs 109.33% for FTHF. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMES charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTHF.
Performance
EMES vs. FTHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMES achieves a 28.30% return, which is significantly lower than FTHF's 51.24% return.
EMES
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 28.30%
- 6M
- 29.99%
- 1Y
- 46.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTHF
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 15.16%
- YTD
- 51.24%
- 6M
- 61.52%
- 1Y
- 109.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMES vs. FTHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMES Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF | 28.30% | 12.63% |
FTHF First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF | 51.24% | 40.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMES and FTHF is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2025 | 0.84 |
The correlation between EMES and FTHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMES vs. FTHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMES
FTHF
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
EMES
FTHF
Industrials
EMES
FTHF
Consumer Cyclical
EMES
FTHF
Financial Services
EMES
FTHF
Communication Services
EMES
FTHF
Consumer Defensive
EMES
FTHF
Real Estate
EMES
FTHF
-
Healthcare
EMES
FTHF
Basic Materials
EMES
-
FTHF
Energy
EMES
-
FTHF
Utilities
EMES
-
FTHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMES vs. FTHF — Risk / Return Rank
EMES
FTHF
EMES vs. FTHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF (EMES) and First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMES | FTHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.62 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 6.74 | -3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.07 | 18.95 | -4.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMES | FTHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 3.36 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.06 | 1.86 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
EMES vs. FTHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMES drawdown since its inception was -12.98%, smaller than the maximum FTHF drawdown of -17.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMES and FTHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMES | FTHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.98% | -17.36% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.98% | -16.31% | +3.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -1.84% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -4.22% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 5.79% | -2.45% |
Volatility
EMES vs. FTHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF (EMES) is 8.70%, while First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) has a volatility of 12.15%. This indicates that EMES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMES | FTHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | 12.15% | -3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.31% | 24.47% | -6.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.89% | 32.76% | -11.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 25.45% | -4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 25.45% | -4.89% |
EMES vs. FTHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMES has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMES vs. FTHF - Dividend Comparison
EMES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than FTHF's 2.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMES Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF | 0.42% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTHF First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF | 2.98% | 4.40% | 3.34% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMES and FTHF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTHF has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to EMES (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMES dropped -12.98% vs FTHF's -17.36%.
On 1-year performance, FTHF leads with 109.33% vs 46.81% for EMES. On fees, EMES is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, EMES has been the lower-risk option at 8.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTHF has performed better with a 109.33% return vs 46.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMES is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTHF.
FTHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.42% for EMES.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EMES and 0.75% for FTHF.
FTHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMES and FTHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer