PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMES vs. AVEE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMES vs. AVEE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF (EMES) and Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF (AVEE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMES achieves a 28.30% return, which is significantly higher than AVEE's 13.83% return.


EMES

1D
-1.25%
1M
5.92%
YTD
28.30%
6M
29.99%
1Y
46.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVEE

1D
-1.25%
1M
0.86%
YTD
13.83%
6M
14.34%
1Y
26.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMES vs. AVEE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMES and AVEE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2025

0.84

The correlation between EMES and AVEE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMES vs. AVEE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMES
AVEE

Technology

42.9%
22.5%

Industrials

16.3%
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
11.3%

Financial Services

14.2%
9.3%

Communication Services

4.7%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
5.4%

Real Estate

3.0%
4.2%

Healthcare

1.1%
6.9%

Basic Materials

-

9.5%

Energy

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Technology

EMES
42.9%
AVEE
22.5%

Industrials

EMES
16.3%
AVEE
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EMES
14.8%
AVEE
11.3%

Financial Services

EMES
14.2%
AVEE
9.3%

Communication Services

EMES
4.7%
AVEE
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

EMES
3.1%
AVEE
5.4%

Real Estate

EMES
3.0%
AVEE
4.2%

Healthcare

EMES
1.1%
AVEE
6.9%

Basic Materials

EMES

-

AVEE
9.5%

Energy

EMES

-

AVEE
2.2%

Utilities

EMES

-

AVEE
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMES vs. AVEE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMES
EMES Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EMES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMES Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMES Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EMES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMES Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEE
AVEE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
AVEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMES vs. AVEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF (EMES) and Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF (AVEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMESAVEEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

2.49

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.07

7.99

+6.08

EMES vs. AVEE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMES Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the AVEE Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMES and AVEE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMESAVEEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.59

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.06

1.05

+1.01

Drawdowns

EMES vs. AVEE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMES drawdown since its inception was -12.98%, smaller than the maximum AVEE drawdown of -20.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMES and AVEE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMESAVEEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.98%

-20.21%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-10.65%

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-2.56%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-3.68%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.32%

+0.02%

Volatility

EMES vs. AVEE - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF (EMES) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF (AVEE) at 6.73%. This indicates that EMES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMESAVEEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.70%

6.73%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.31%

13.98%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.89%

16.74%

+4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.56%

16.62%

+3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.56%

16.62%

+3.94%

EMES vs. AVEE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMES has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEE's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMES vs. AVEE - Dividend Comparison

EMES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than AVEE's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVEE
Avantis Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity ETF
2.03%2.25%3.26%0.39%
EMES
Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
0.42%0.53%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMES and AVEE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMES has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to AVEE (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMES dropped -12.98% vs AVEE's -20.21%.

On 1-year performance, EMES leads with 46.81% vs 26.42% for AVEE. On fees, AVEE is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, AVEE has been the lower-risk option at 6.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EMES has performed better with a 46.81% return vs 26.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVEE is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMES.

AVEE has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.42% for EMES.

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EMES and 0.42% for AVEE.

EMES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMES and AVEE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer