PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMEQ vs. EICIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMEQ vs. EICIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and EIC Value Fund (EICIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 70.13% return, which is significantly higher than EICIX's 5.81% return.


EMEQ

1D
0.81%
1M
10.20%
YTD
70.13%
6M
81.37%
1Y
141.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EICIX

1D
0.80%
1M
4.47%
YTD
5.81%
6M
4.81%
1Y
13.57%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
11.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEQ vs. EICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
70.13%69.78%-0.73%
EICIX
EIC Value Fund
5.81%16.01%0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEQ and EICIX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMEQ vs. EICIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEQ
EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

EICIX
EICIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
EICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEQ vs. EICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and EIC Value Fund (EICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMEQEICIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.20

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.71

1.54

+6.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.78

3.81

+24.98

EMEQ vs. EICIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.89, which is higher than the EICIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEQ and EICIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMEQ vs. EICIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum EICIX drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and EICIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMEQEICIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.99%

-34.26%

+14.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.91%

-8.55%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.69%

-3.66%

-2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-3.41%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

3.39%

+1.40%

Volatility

EMEQ vs. EICIX - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a higher volatility of 19.34% compared to EIC Value Fund (EICIX) at 2.99%. This indicates that EMEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMEQEICIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.34%

2.99%

+16.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.54%

8.16%

+24.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.48%

11.55%

+23.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.87%

14.59%

+17.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.87%

16.27%

+15.60%

EMEQ vs. EICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than EICIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMEQ vs. EICIX - Dividend Comparison

EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than EICIX's 8.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EICIX
EIC Value Fund
8.46%8.95%9.47%4.09%6.07%11.14%6.05%7.71%10.82%8.51%2.03%3.42%
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.62%2.76%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMEQ and EICIX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMEQ has higher volatility (19.34%) compared to EICIX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMEQ dropped -19.99% vs EICIX's -34.26%.

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMEQ and EICIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer