EMEQ vs. BITI
EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMEQ is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Nomura, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. EMEQ is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past year, EMEQ returned 112.52% vs 68.34% for BITI. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. EMEQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
EMEQ vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 58.76% return, which is significantly higher than BITI's 28.75% return.
EMEQ
- 1D
- -6.63%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- 6M
- 46.07%
- YTD
- 58.76%
- 1Y
- 112.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITI
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 34.68%
- YTD
- 28.75%
- 1Y
- 68.34%
- 3Y*
- -30.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMEQ vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 58.76% | 69.78% | -0.73% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 28.75% | -1.76% | -41.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMEQ and BITI is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | -0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMEQ vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
EMEQ
BITI
EMEQ vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMEQ | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.26 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.19 | 2.72 | +3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.60 | 6.78 | +13.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMEQ vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMEQ | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.99% | -92.16% | +72.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.29% | -25.28% | +6.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.29% | -85.94% | +67.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -68.34% | +64.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 10.11% | -4.63% |
Volatility
EMEQ vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a higher volatility of 19.40% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 11.38%. This indicates that EMEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMEQ | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.40% | 11.38% | +8.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.21% | 34.25% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.86% | 44.14% | -5.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.59% | 52.28% | -18.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.59% | 52.28% | -18.69% |
EMEQ vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMEQ vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 15.10% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% |
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.74% | 2.76% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMEQ and BITI have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMEQ has higher volatility (19.40%) compared to BITI (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMEQ dropped -19.99% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 112.52% vs 68.34% for BITI. On fees, EMEQ is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 11.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 112.52% return vs 68.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMEQ is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 1.74% for EMEQ.
EMEQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Nomura and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMEQ and 1.03% for BITI.
EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMEQ and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer