EMEQ vs. BITI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMEQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Nomura, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. EMEQ is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past year, EMEQ returned 110.88% vs 58.64% for BITI. Their -0.36 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EMEQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

EMEQ vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 53.76% return, which is significantly higher than BITI's 27.11% return.

EMEQ

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -8.23%
• 6M: 30.45%
• YTD: 53.76%
• 1Y: 110.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 65.06%

BITI

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: -2.58%
• 6M: 22.77%
• YTD: 27.11%
• 1Y: 58.64%
• 3Y*: -31.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -35.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	$24.10M	$26.49M	$38.71M
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$8.75M	$9.16M	$11.52M

EMEQ vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	53.76%	69.78%	-0.73%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	27.11%	-1.76%	-41.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEQ and BITI is -0.45, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	-0.36

Return for Risk

EMEQ vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 91
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 61
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMEQ vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMEQ	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	1.45	+1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	2.02	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.24	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	2.53	+1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.08	6.17	+8.91

EMEQ vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEQ and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMEQ vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -26.25%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMEQ	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.25%	-92.16%	+65.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.25%	-25.28%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.86%	-86.12%	+65.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.67%	-68.59%	+63.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.18%	10.35%	-3.17%

Volatility

EMEQ vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a higher volatility of 14.87% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 9.13%. This indicates that EMEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMEQ	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.87%	9.13%	+5.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.54%	33.31%	+4.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.39%	44.23%	-3.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.15%	52.03%	-17.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.15%	52.03%	-17.88%

EMEQ vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMEQ vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than BITI's 15.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.17%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.79%	2.76%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMEQ and BITI in my portfolio?

EMEQ and BITI have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMEQ or BITI?

EMEQ has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to BITI (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMEQ dropped -26.25% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, EMEQ or BITI?

On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 110.88% vs 58.64% for BITI. On fees, EMEQ is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 9.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMEQ or BITI?

Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 110.88% return vs 58.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMEQ or BITI?

EMEQ is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMEQ or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.17%, compared with 1.79% for EMEQ.

What is the main difference between EMEQ and BITI?

EMEQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Nomura and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMEQ and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.