EMEM vs. EMSC

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

EMEM (Sophus Capital Emerging Market ETF) and EMSC (Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Sophus Capital. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMEM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for EMSC.

Performance

EMEM vs. EMSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sophus Capital Emerging Market ETF (EMEM) and Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF (EMSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EMEM

• 1D: -3.34%
• 1M: 1.75%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMSC

• 1D: -2.99%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEM vs. EMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EMEM Sophus Capital Emerging Market ETF	1.37%
EMSC Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF	-0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEM and EMSC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2026	0.89

Return for Risk

EMEM vs. EMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sophus Capital Emerging Market ETF (EMEM) and Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF (EMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

EMEM vs. EMSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEM drawdown since its inception was -8.12%, which is greater than EMSC's maximum drawdown of -7.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEM and EMSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMEM	EMSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.12%	-7.52%	-0.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.79%	-7.09%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-3.36%	+0.30%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMEM	EMSC	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.40%	33.99%	+4.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.40%	33.99%	+4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.40%	33.99%	+4.41%

EMEM vs. EMSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EMSC's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMEM vs. EMSC - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMEM nor EMSC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMEM and EMSC in my portfolio?

EMEM and EMSC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMEM or EMSC?

On fees, EMEM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMEM or EMSC?

EMEM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for EMSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMEM or EMSC?

EMEM and EMSC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EMEM and EMSC?

Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EMEM and 0.85% for EMSC.