PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMEH.DE vs. UIQ1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMEH.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (UIQ1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEH.DE achieves a 21.33% return, which is significantly lower than UIQ1.DE's 22.64% return.


EMEH.DE

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.49%
YTD
21.33%
6M
22.74%
1Y
43.19%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*

UIQ1.DE

1D
-1.00%
1M
1.33%
YTD
22.64%
6M
25.07%
1Y
38.99%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEH.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMEH.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR
21.33%25.40%6.63%-12.26%11.15%27.11%-4.42%7.62%-90.10%4.93%
UIQ1.DE
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
22.64%17.35%4.90%-7.27%9.59%33.73%-4.28%8.46%-13.91%6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEH.DE and UIQ1.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017

0.91

The correlation between EMEH.DE and UIQ1.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMEH.DE vs. UIQ1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEH.DE
EMEH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

UIQ1.DE
UIQ1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UIQ1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIQ1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIQ1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UIQ1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIQ1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEH.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (UIQ1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMEH.DEUIQ1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.95

5.99

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.34

16.75

-2.41

EMEH.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the UIQ1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEH.DE and UIQ1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMEH.DEUIQ1.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.64

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.59

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.48

0.51

-0.99

Drawdowns

EMEH.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEH.DE drawdown since its inception was -92.42%, which is greater than UIQ1.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEH.DE and UIQ1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMEH.DEUIQ1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.42%

-39.99%

-52.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-6.62%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.28%

-13.55%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-30.51%

-2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.34%

-2.05%

-78.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.38%

-15.09%

-66.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.37%

+0.71%

Volatility

EMEH.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (UIQ1.DE) at 3.79%. This indicates that EMEH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UIQ1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMEH.DEUIQ1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

3.79%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.95%

12.91%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

15.03%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

18.19%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.16%

17.45%

+16.71%

EMEH.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEH.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than UIQ1.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMEH.DE vs. UIQ1.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMEH.DE nor UIQ1.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, EMEH.DE and UIQ1.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UIQ1.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UIQ1.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMEH.DE.

EMEH.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged), while UIQ1.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMEH.DE and 0.34% for UIQ1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMEH.DE and UIQ1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer