EMEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EMEH.DE (BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR) and UEQU.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - EMEH.DE tracks the BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged) while UEQU.DE tracks the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMEH.DE returned 11.35%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for UEQU.DE. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMEH.DE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UEQU.DE.

Performance

EMEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEH.DE achieves a 21.33% return, which is significantly lower than UEQU.DE's 25.53% return.

EMEH.DE

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 21.33%
• 6M: 22.74%
• 1Y: 43.19%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: —

UEQU.DE

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 25.53%
• 6M: 28.14%
• 1Y: 41.09%
• 3Y*: 14.81%
• 5Y*: 14.40%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMEH.DE BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR	21.33%	25.40%	6.63%	-12.26%	11.15%	27.11%	-4.42%	7.62%	-90.10%	4.93%
UEQU.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	25.53%	6.36%	13.03%	-8.33%	20.34%	46.31%	-10.57%	14.71%	-7.23%	5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEH.DE and UEQU.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017	0.80

The correlation between EMEH.DE and UEQU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EMEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEH.DE

EMEH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EMEH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EMEH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EMEH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EMEH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

UEQU.DE

UEQU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 82
UEQU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
UEQU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
UEQU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
UEQU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
UEQU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMEH.DE	UEQU.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.60	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	3.40	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.46	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.95	6.29	-1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.34	15.25	-0.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the UEQU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEH.DE and UEQU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMEH.DE	UEQU.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.60	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.85	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.48	0.64	-1.12

Drawdowns

EMEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEH.DE drawdown since its inception was -92.42%, which is greater than UEQU.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEH.DE and UEQU.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMEH.DE	UEQU.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.42%	-30.56%	-61.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-6.50%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.28%	-15.66%	+3.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.73%	-22.44%	-10.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.34%	-1.21%	-79.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.38%	-8.92%	-72.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	2.69%	+0.39%

Volatility

EMEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) at 3.91%. This indicates that EMEH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEQU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMEH.DE	UEQU.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	3.91%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.95%	13.03%	+2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.83%	15.73%	+2.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	16.83%	+0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.16%	16.41%	+17.75%

EMEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMEH.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than UEQU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMEH.DE vs. UEQU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMEH.DE nor UEQU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMEH.DE and UEQU.DE in my portfolio?

EMEH.DE and UEQU.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMEH.DE or UEQU.DE?

On fees, UEQU.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMEH.DE or UEQU.DE?

UEQU.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMEH.DE.

What is the main difference between EMEH.DE and UEQU.DE?

EMEH.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged), while UEQU.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMEH.DE and 0.34% for UEQU.DE.