PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMEH.DE vs. GSDE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMEH.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (GSDE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEH.DE achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly lower than GSDE.DE's 16.49% return.


EMEH.DE

1D
0.33%
1M
-2.04%
6M
9.77%
YTD
11.85%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
12.57%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*

GSDE.DE

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.45%
6M
12.56%
YTD
16.49%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
-2.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEH.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMEH.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR
11.85%25.43%6.61%-12.28%11.18%27.11%-4.38%7.56%-90.10%-88.20%
GSDE.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR
16.49%13.79%14.91%-12.92%21.31%39.05%-11.19%13.24%-67.88%5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEH.DE and GSDE.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017

0.83

The correlation between EMEH.DE and GSDE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMEH.DE vs. GSDE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEH.DE
EMEH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

GSDE.DE
GSDE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GSDE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSDE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSDE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GSDE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSDE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEH.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (GSDE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMEH.DEGSDE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.84

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

8.43

-2.27

EMEH.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the GSDE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEH.DE and GSDE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMEH.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEH.DE drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than GSDE.DE's maximum drawdown of -91.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEH.DE and GSDE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMEH.DEGSDE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-91.25%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-11.90%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.53%

-15.26%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.74%

-29.70%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.89%

-77.41%

-20.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-96.26%

-72.35%

-23.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.72%

4.01%

+0.71%

Volatility

EMEH.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (GSDE.DE) at 3.84%. This indicates that EMEH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSDE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMEH.DEGSDE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

3.84%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.19%

15.60%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

18.59%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

17.90%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24,924.34%

117.87%

+24,806.47%

EMEH.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMEH.DE and GSDE.DE have an expense ratio of 0.39%.


Dividends

EMEH.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMEH.DE nor GSDE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EMEH.DE and GSDE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMEH.DE and GSDE.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.

EMEH.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged), while GSDE.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMEH.DE and GSDE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer