EMDV.L vs. USSC.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EMDV.L (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)) and USSC.L (SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMDV.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while USSC.L is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMDV.L returned 6.88%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for USSC.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMDV.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for USSC.L.

Performance

EMDV.L vs. USSC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EMDV.L is traded in GBP, while USSC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the USSC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDV.L achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than USSC.L's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, EMDV.L has underperformed USSC.L with an annualized return of 6.88%, while USSC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.

EMDV.L

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -1.07%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 2.18%
• 1Y: 9.77%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: 5.38%
• 10Y*: 6.88%

USSC.L

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 14.21%
• 6M: 13.60%
• 1Y: 38.05%
• 3Y*: 16.77%
• 5Y*: 10.83%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDV.L vs. USSC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMDV.L SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)	3.89%	8.10%	16.29%	-0.66%	1.92%	0.14%	-5.08%	7.32%	-0.61%	16.71%
USSC.L SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF	14.21%	6.56%	10.22%	17.02%	0.54%	36.50%	5.57%	18.50%	-10.28%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDV.L and USSC.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015	0.46

The correlation between EMDV.L and USSC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMDV.L vs. USSC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMDV.L	USSC.L
Financial Services	32.9%	19.8%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	14.0%
Communication Services	12.9%	2.7%
Industrials	12.4%	14.7%
Real Estate	7.0%	6.2%
Technology	6.7%	9.4%
Energy	5.3%	11.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	6.0%
Healthcare	2.6%	7.5%
Basic Materials	2.2%	6.1%
Utilities	2.0%	2.5%

Return for Risk

EMDV.L vs. USSC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDV.L

EMDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 23
EMDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
EMDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
EMDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
EMDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
EMDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22

USSC.L

USSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
USSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
USSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
USSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
USSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
USSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDV.L vs. USSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMDV.L	USSC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	2.41	-1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	3.24	-2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.42	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	5.31	-4.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.64	17.68	-15.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMDV.L vs. USSC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the USSC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDV.L and USSC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMDV.L	USSC.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	2.41	-1.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.53	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.57	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.53	-0.29

Drawdowns

EMDV.L vs. USSC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDV.L drawdown since its inception was -48.26%, which is greater than USSC.L's maximum drawdown of -43.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV.L and USSC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMDV.L	USSC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.26%	-43.40%	-4.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.38%	-7.13%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.20%	-28.91%	+15.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.31%	-28.91%	+13.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.93%	-43.40%	+8.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.29%	0.00%	-5.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.49%	-7.95%	-5.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.70%	2.15%	+1.55%

Volatility

EMDV.L vs. USSC.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMDV.L	USSC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	3.69%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.56%	10.24%	-1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.78%	15.72%	-3.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.56%	20.60%	-6.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.96%	22.18%	-5.22%

EMDV.L vs. USSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDV.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than USSC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMDV.L vs. USSC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMDV.L nor USSC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMDV.L SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)	0.00%	1.29%	4.08%	4.98%	4.45%	3.28%	3.19%	3.83%	3.49%	2.89%	4.15%	5.95%
USSC.L SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMDV.L and USSC.L in my portfolio?

EMDV.L and USSC.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMDV.L or USSC.L?

On fees, USSC.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMDV.L or USSC.L?

USSC.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMDV.L.

What is the main difference between EMDV.L and USSC.L?

EMDV.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while USSC.L is Small Cap Value Equities. EMDV.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EMDV.L and 0.30% for USSC.L.