EMDV.L vs. DEM.L
EMDV.L (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)) and DEM.L (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from State Street and WisdomTree respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMDV.L returned 6.88%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for DEM.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMDV.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for DEM.L.
Performance
EMDV.L vs. DEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMDV.L is traded in GBP, while DEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DEM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDV.L achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than DEM.L's 19.41% return. Over the past 10 years, EMDV.L has underperformed DEM.L with an annualized return of 6.88%, while DEM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.
EMDV.L
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 9.77%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.88%
DEM.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- 19.41%
- 6M
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
EMDV.L vs. DEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDV.L SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) | 3.89% | 8.10% | 16.29% | -0.66% | 1.92% | 0.14% | -5.08% | 7.32% | -0.61% | 16.71% |
DEM.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF | 19.41% | 12.71% | 11.70% | 18.04% | -2.59% | 15.16% | -6.66% | 17.84% | -1.94% | 14.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMDV.L and DEM.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014 | 0.74 |
The correlation between EMDV.L and DEM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EMDV.L vs. DEM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMDV.L
DEM.L
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Financial Services
EMDV.L
DEM.L
Consumer Cyclical
EMDV.L
DEM.L
Communication Services
EMDV.L
DEM.L
Industrials
EMDV.L
DEM.L
Real Estate
EMDV.L
DEM.L
Technology
EMDV.L
DEM.L
Energy
EMDV.L
DEM.L
Consumer Defensive
EMDV.L
DEM.L
Healthcare
EMDV.L
DEM.L
Basic Materials
EMDV.L
DEM.L
Utilities
EMDV.L
DEM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMDV.L vs. DEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMDV.L
DEM.L
EMDV.L vs. DEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMDV.L | DEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.42 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 4.80 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | 16.63 | -13.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMDV.L | DEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 2.40 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.97 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.84 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.60 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
EMDV.L vs. DEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDV.L drawdown since its inception was -48.26%, which is greater than DEM.L's maximum drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDV.L and DEM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMDV.L | DEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.26% | -35.94% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -6.56% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.20% | -12.37% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.31% | -14.48% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.93% | -30.09% | -4.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.29% | -0.59% | -4.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.49% | -6.54% | -6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 1.90% | +1.80% |
Volatility
EMDV.L vs. DEM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L) is 3.75%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEM.L) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that EMDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMDV.L | DEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 4.23% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 9.73% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.78% | 13.09% | -1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 13.31% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 16.47% | +0.49% |
EMDV.L vs. DEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDV.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DEM.L's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMDV.L vs. DEM.L - Dividend Comparison
EMDV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF | 3.72% | 4.47% | 11.82% | 9.48% | 7.05% | 4.14% | 9.14% | 6.10% | 4.19% | 3.16% | 1.48% | 4.55% |
EMDV.L SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.00% | 1.29% | 4.08% | 4.98% | 4.45% | 3.28% | 3.19% | 3.83% | 3.49% | 2.89% | 4.15% | 5.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMDV.L and DEM.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DEM.L is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DEM.L is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMDV.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EMDV.L and 0.46% for DEM.L.
Find the right allocation for EMDV.L and DEM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer