EMD5.L vs. XUEB.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

EMD5.L (L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XUEB.L (Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMD5.L tracks the J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity Index while XUEB.L tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMD5.L returned 2.39%/yr vs 1.72%/yr for XUEB.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

EMD5.L vs. XUEB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMD5.L) and Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMD5.L achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than XUEB.L's 2.42% return.

EMD5.L

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.21%
• 6M: 1.53%
• YTD: -0.96%
• 1Y: 3.67%
• 3Y*: 7.13%
• 5Y*: 2.39%
• 10Y*: —

XUEB.L

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.73%
• 6M: 2.26%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 1Y: 10.67%
• 3Y*: 9.03%
• 5Y*: 1.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMD5.L vs. XUEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EMD5.L L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	-0.96%	10.15%	8.41%	7.84%	-10.41%	-0.28%	0.80%
XUEB.L Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C	2.42%	13.61%	6.09%	11.06%	-19.50%	-2.36%	1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EMD5.L and XUEB.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020	0.75

The correlation between EMD5.L and XUEB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EMD5.L vs. XUEB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMD5.L

EMD5.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
EMD5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
EMD5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
EMD5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
EMD5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
EMD5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

XUEB.L

XUEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
XUEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
XUEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
XUEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
XUEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
XUEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMD5.L vs. XUEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMD5.L) and Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMD5.L	XUEB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.97	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	3.09	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.39	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	2.65	-1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.76	11.04	-8.28

EMD5.L vs. XUEB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMD5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the XUEB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMD5.L and XUEB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMD5.L vs. XUEB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMD5.L drawdown since its inception was -16.04%, smaller than the maximum XUEB.L drawdown of -29.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMD5.L and XUEB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMD5.L	XUEB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.04%	-29.92%	+13.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.29%	-4.09%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.29%	-7.88%	+4.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.04%	-29.92%	+13.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-0.86%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.32%	-8.78%	+4.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.31%	0.98%	+0.33%

Volatility

EMD5.L vs. XUEB.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMD5.L) has a higher volatility of 0.95% compared to Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.L) at 0.87%. This indicates that EMD5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUEB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMD5.L	XUEB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.95%	0.87%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.51%	4.66%	-1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.97%	5.52%	-1.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.85%	9.06%	-4.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.62%	9.75%	-5.13%

EMD5.L vs. XUEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMD5.L and XUEB.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EMD5.L vs. XUEB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMD5.L nor XUEB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EMD5.L L&G Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	0.00%	5.66%	6.09%	4.60%	3.04%	1.25%
XUEB.L Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMD5.L and XUEB.L in my portfolio?

EMD5.L and XUEB.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMD5.L or XUEB.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMD5.L or XUEB.L?

EMD5.L and XUEB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between EMD5.L and XUEB.L?

EMD5.L tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity Index, while XUEB.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Xtrackers.