EMD vs. FSEDX
EMD (Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Inc) and FSEDX (Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, EMD returned 4.86%/yr vs 3.39%/yr for FSEDX. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EMD charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FSEDX.
Performance
EMD vs. FSEDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMD achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly higher than FSEDX's 2.01% return.
EMD
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.86%
- 10Y*
- 5.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.63%
FSEDX
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.76M | $1.98M | $1.97M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
EMD vs. FSEDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMD Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Inc | 4.84% | 23.41% | 16.23% | 12.23% | -20.78% | -0.32% | 4.57% |
FSEDX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund | 2.01% | 19.49% | -2.54% | 13.58% | -7.94% | -9.28% | 3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMD and FSEDX is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2020 | 0.37 |
The correlation between EMD and FSEDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMD vs. FSEDX — Risk / Return Rank
EMD
FSEDX
EMD vs. FSEDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Inc (EMD) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (FSEDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMD | FSEDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.28 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.56 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.54 | 4.76 | -0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMD vs. FSEDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMD drawdown since its inception was -48.26%, which is greater than FSEDX's maximum drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMD and FSEDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMD | FSEDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.26% | -24.77% | -23.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -6.10% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.33% | -7.89% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.43% | -21.59% | -18.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -1.63% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.75% | -7.84% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 1.99% | +1.40% |
Volatility
EMD vs. FSEDX - Volatility Comparison
Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Inc (EMD) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (FSEDX) at 1.64%. This indicates that EMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSEDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMD | FSEDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 1.64% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.39% | 5.70% | +4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 6.44% | +6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 7.62% | +8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 7.65% | +10.72% |
EMD vs. FSEDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMD has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FSEDX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMD vs. FSEDX - Dividend Comparison
EMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.89%, more than FSEDX's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMD Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Inc | 10.89% | 10.44% | 10.57% | 9.97% | 11.09% | 8.44% | 8.45% | 8.41% | 9.76% | 7.78% | 9.99% | 9.54% |
FSEDX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund | 7.41% | 6.97% | 6.92% | 5.14% | 0.00% | 3.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMD and FSEDX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMD has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to FSEDX (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMD dropped -48.26% vs FSEDX's -24.77%.
FSEDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMD and FSEDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer