PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCR vs. EEMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMCR vs. EEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMCR vs. EEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMCR
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF
1.96%33.25%9.69%10.55%-18.73%5.54%13.49%22.41%-1.76%
EEMD
AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%9.61%17.60%-11.21%5.54%-0.35%12.55%-4.86%

Returns By Period


EMCR

1D
0.85%
1M
-7.60%
YTD
1.96%
6M
4.10%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*

EEMD

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMCR vs. EEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMCR vs. EEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMCR
EMCR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EMCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCR Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCR Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMCR vs. EEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMCREEMDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.67

EMCR vs. EEMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMCREEMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

Correlation

The correlation between EMCR and EEMD is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EMCR vs. EEMD - Dividend Comparison

EMCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMCR
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF
2.38%2.43%6.62%1.95%3.05%1.83%1.75%3.15%0.19%0.00%
EEMD
AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF
0.00%0.00%4.03%8.41%7.66%6.34%3.84%5.35%4.91%0.42%

Drawdowns

EMCR vs. EEMD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCREEMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

Volatility

EMCR vs. EEMD - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMCREEMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%