EMCR vs. EEMD
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD).
EMCR and EEMD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMCR is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Dec 6, 2018. EEMD is a passively managed fund by Advisors Asset Management that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield. It was launched on Nov 28, 2017. Both EMCR and EEMD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EMCR vs. EEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMCR vs. EEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 1.96% | 33.25% | 9.69% | 10.55% | -18.73% | 5.54% | 13.49% | 22.41% | -1.76% |
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.61% | 17.60% | -11.21% | 5.54% | -0.35% | 12.55% | -4.86% |
Returns By Period
EMCR
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -7.60%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- —
EEMD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMCR vs. EEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMCR vs. EEMD — Risk / Return Rank
EMCR
EEMD
EMCR vs. EEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) and AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMCR | EEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.06 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMCR | EEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCR and EEMD is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMCR vs. EEMD - Dividend Comparison
EMCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 2.38% | 2.43% | 6.62% | 1.95% | 3.05% | 1.83% | 1.75% | 3.15% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.03% | 8.41% | 7.66% | 6.34% | 3.84% | 5.35% | 4.91% | 0.42% |
Drawdowns
EMCR vs. EEMD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCR | EEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.23% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | — | — |
Volatility
EMCR vs. EEMD - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMCR | EEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.89% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.81% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | — | — |