PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCL.NEO vs. HYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMCL.NEO vs. HYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO) and High Yield ETF (HYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMCL.NEO is traded in CAD, while HYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYLD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


EMCL.NEO

1D
-0.68%
1M
11.93%
YTD
27.22%
6M
27.94%
1Y
56.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYLD

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMCL.NEO vs. HYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMCL.NEO
Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF
27.22%23.04%7.65%
HYLD
High Yield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

EMCL.NEO vs. HYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMCL.NEO
HYLD

Technology

36.1%
34.8%

Financial Services

20.8%
0.5%

Basic Materials

8.0%
0.0%

Industrials

7.6%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
9.6%

Communication Services

7.3%
10.8%

Energy

4.0%
29.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
4.7%

Healthcare

2.6%
5.0%

Utilities

2.0%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.2%

Technology

EMCL.NEO
36.1%
HYLD
34.8%

Financial Services

EMCL.NEO
20.8%
HYLD
0.5%

Basic Materials

EMCL.NEO
8.0%
HYLD
0.0%

Industrials

EMCL.NEO
7.6%
HYLD
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EMCL.NEO
7.4%
HYLD
9.6%

Communication Services

EMCL.NEO
7.3%
HYLD
10.8%

Energy

EMCL.NEO
4.0%
HYLD
29.9%

Consumer Defensive

EMCL.NEO
3.0%
HYLD
4.7%

Healthcare

EMCL.NEO
2.6%
HYLD
5.0%

Utilities

EMCL.NEO
2.0%
HYLD
1.1%

Real Estate

EMCL.NEO
1.2%
HYLD
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMCL.NEO vs. HYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMCL.NEO
EMCL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMCL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

HYLD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMCL.NEO vs. HYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO) and High Yield ETF (HYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMCL.NEOHYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.90

EMCL.NEO vs. HYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMCL.NEOHYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.57

Drawdowns

EMCL.NEO vs. HYLD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCL.NEOHYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

Volatility

EMCL.NEO vs. HYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMCL.NEOHYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

Dividends

EMCL.NEO vs. HYLD - Dividend Comparison

EMCL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, while HYLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMCL.NEO
Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF
10.17%11.76%7.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYLD
High Yield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.67%7.86%6.45%7.52%7.46%7.97%7.18%6.59%10.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMCL.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HYLD is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Eve Capital.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMCL.NEO and HYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer