EMCL.NEO vs. GLCC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO).
EMCL.NEO and GLCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMCL.NEO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on May 28, 2024. GLCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Apr 11, 2011.
Performance
EMCL.NEO vs. GLCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMCL.NEO vs. GLCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EMCL.NEO Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF | -2.51% | 8.42% | 0.25% |
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | 5.98% | 137.43% | 3.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCL.NEO achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly lower than GLCC.TO's 5.98% return.
EMCL.NEO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -10.88%
- YTD
- -2.51%
- 6M
- -3.05%
- 1Y
- 5.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLCC.TO
- 1D
- 5.95%
- 1M
- -18.48%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 86.11%
- 3Y*
- 43.56%
- 5Y*
- 25.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMCL.NEO vs. GLCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
EMCL.NEO vs. GLCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EMCL.NEO
GLCC.TO
EMCL.NEO vs. GLCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMCL.NEO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 2.10 | -1.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 2.39 | -1.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.36 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 3.04 | -2.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.55 | 11.66 | -11.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMCL.NEO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 2.10 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.00 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCL.NEO and GLCC.TO is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EMCL.NEO vs. GLCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
EMCL.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCL.NEO Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | 6.21% | 6.01% | 10.30% | 11.16% | 10.08% | 6.31% | 6.47% | 4.58% | 5.62% | 7.09% | 9.21% | 11.63% |
Drawdowns
EMCL.NEO vs. GLCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, smaller than the maximum GLCC.TO drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCL.NEO and GLCC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCL.NEO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.61% | -71.12% | +50.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.83% | -28.86% | +12.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.53% | -18.48% | +4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -34.62% | +30.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.82% | 7.54% | -2.72% |
Volatility
EMCL.NEO vs. GLCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO) is 12.47%, while Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a volatility of 17.09%. This indicates that EMCL.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMCL.NEO | GLCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.47% | 17.09% | -4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.21% | 34.47% | -18.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.70% | 41.29% | -19.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 31.17% | -11.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 31.75% | -12.43% |