PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCL.NEO vs. AVGY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMCL.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO) and Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCL.NEO achieves a 27.22% return, which is significantly lower than AVGY.TO's 42.92% return.


EMCL.NEO

1D
-0.68%
1M
11.93%
YTD
27.22%
6M
27.94%
1Y
56.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVGY.TO

1D
-0.45%
1M
19.17%
YTD
42.92%
6M
27.21%
1Y
107.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMCL.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMCL.NEO and AVGY.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMCL.NEO vs. AVGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMCL.NEO
EMCL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMCL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGY.TO
AVGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AVGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMCL.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO) and Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMCL.NEOAVGY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.38

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

3.81

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.90

8.81

+7.08

EMCL.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCL.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is comparable to the AVGY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCL.NEO and AVGY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMCL.NEOAVGY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

2.39

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.57

2.30

-0.73

Drawdowns

EMCL.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -19.19%, smaller than the maximum AVGY.TO drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCL.NEO and AVGY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCL.NEOAVGY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.19%

-28.78%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-28.50%

+15.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.45%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-8.43%

+5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

12.29%

-8.76%

Volatility

EMCL.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO) is 7.86%, while Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO) has a volatility of 13.20%. This indicates that EMCL.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMCL.NEOAVGY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

13.20%

-5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.41%

33.23%

-16.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.54%

45.46%

-26.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

51.13%

-32.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

51.13%

-32.13%

Dividends

EMCL.NEO vs. AVGY.TO - Dividend Comparison

EMCL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, less than AVGY.TO's 19.08% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


EMCL.NEO and AVGY.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMCL.NEO and AVGY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer