EMCA.L vs. EMLB.L
EMCA.L (iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EMLB.L (PIMCO Advantage Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMCA.L tracks the J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index while EMLB.L tracks the PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Currency Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMCA.L returned 1.90%/yr vs 3.90%/yr for EMLB.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMCA.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EMLB.L.
Performance
EMCA.L vs. EMLB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMCA.L achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than EMLB.L's 2.55% return.
EMCA.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 5.60%
- 3Y*
- 6.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- —
EMLB.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- 8.40%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.90%
- 10Y*
- 3.12%
EMCA.L vs. EMLB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCA.L iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.49% | 8.60% | 6.21% | 7.96% | -12.09% | -0.51% | 7.04% | 13.77% | 0.89% |
EMLB.L PIMCO Advantage Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.55% | 17.08% | -3.25% | 13.74% | -5.70% | -5.53% | 1.91% | 13.10% | -3.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMCA.L and EMLB.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2018 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMCA.L vs. EMLB.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMCA.L
EMLB.L
EMCA.L vs. EMLB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMCA.L) and PIMCO Advantage Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMLB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMCA.L | EMLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 1.53 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.78 | 4.98 | +4.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMCA.L vs. EMLB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMCA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.69%, smaller than the maximum EMLB.L drawdown of -29.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCA.L and EMLB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMCA.L | EMLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.69% | -29.75% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.21% | -5.48% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.58% | -7.50% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.14% | -20.09% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -1.40% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -9.33% | +5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 1.68% | -1.11% |
Volatility
EMCA.L vs. EMLB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMCA.L) is 1.06%, while PIMCO Advantage Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMLB.L) has a volatility of 1.78%. This indicates that EMCA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMCA.L | EMLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 1.78% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.26% | 6.18% | -2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 7.00% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 9.48% | -4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.78% | 9.58% | -0.80% |
EMCA.L vs. EMLB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMCA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMLB.L's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMCA.L vs. EMLB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMCA.L nor EMLB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMCA.L and EMLB.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMLB.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMLB.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMCA.L.
EMCA.L tracks J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index, while EMLB.L tracks PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Currency Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EMCA.L and 0.39% for EMLB.L.
Find the right allocation for EMCA.L and EMLB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer