PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMAYX vs. GAGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMAYX vs. GAGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund (EMAYX) and The Gabelli Global Rising Income and Dividend Fund (GAGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMAYX achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly higher than GAGCX's 4.74% return. Over the past 10 years, EMAYX has underperformed GAGCX with an annualized return of 5.86%, while GAGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.82% annualized return.


EMAYX

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.25%
YTD
7.73%
6M
9.99%
1Y
24.47%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
5.86%

GAGCX

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.89%
YTD
4.74%
6M
7.00%
1Y
15.78%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
6.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMAYX vs. GAGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMAYX
Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund
7.73%21.17%4.10%5.96%-8.78%9.83%5.29%7.71%-2.78%5.61%
GAGCX
The Gabelli Global Rising Income and Dividend Fund
4.74%22.11%-0.99%9.93%-15.66%21.32%11.68%14.38%-14.01%20.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EMAYX and GAGCX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2001

0.74

The correlation between EMAYX and GAGCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMAYX vs. GAGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMAYX
EMAYX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EMAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EMAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GAGCX
GAGCX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GAGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GAGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMAYX vs. GAGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund (EMAYX) and The Gabelli Global Rising Income and Dividend Fund (GAGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMAYXGAGCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.67

1.40

+1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.84

2.08

+1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.25

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

1.62

+2.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.35

5.65

+11.70

EMAYX vs. GAGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMAYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the GAGCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMAYX and GAGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMAYXGAGCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

1.40

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.29

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.48

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.08

+0.37

Drawdowns

EMAYX vs. GAGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMAYX drawdown since its inception was -47.93%, smaller than the maximum GAGCX drawdown of -79.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMAYX and GAGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMAYXGAGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.93%

-79.95%

+32.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.82%

-9.47%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.32%

-14.51%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.95%

-28.38%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.90%

-37.89%

+12.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-27.79%

+26.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-45.40%

+40.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

2.71%

-1.29%

Volatility

EMAYX vs. GAGCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund (EMAYX) is 2.80%, while The Gabelli Global Rising Income and Dividend Fund (GAGCX) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that EMAYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMAYXGAGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

3.35%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.49%

8.38%

-1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.36%

11.23%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.95%

13.89%

-2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.56%

14.25%

-3.69%

EMAYX vs. GAGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMAYX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GAGCX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMAYX vs. GAGCX - Dividend Comparison

EMAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than GAGCX's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMAYX
Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund
3.91%4.21%0.00%3.00%0.80%6.84%0.24%1.80%5.52%1.24%0.00%0.00%
GAGCX
The Gabelli Global Rising Income and Dividend Fund
2.73%2.86%0.00%2.38%3.66%1.57%0.68%0.49%1.66%1.35%1.02%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMAYX and GAGCX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAGCX has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to EMAYX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMAYX dropped -47.93% vs GAGCX's -79.95%.

EMAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMAYX and GAGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer