EMAX.TO vs. NXF.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMAX.TO (Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and NXF.TO (CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EMAX.TO returned 48.14% vs 45.90% for NXF.TO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure.

Performance

EMAX.TO vs. NXF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMAX.TO achieves a 30.76% return, which is significantly lower than NXF.TO's 32.43% return.

EMAX.TO

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 30.76%
• 6M: 24.14%
• 1Y: 48.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NXF.TO

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: -2.11%
• YTD: 32.43%
• 6M: 29.37%
• 1Y: 45.90%
• 3Y*: 15.64%
• 5Y*: 17.39%
• 10Y*: 8.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMAX.TO vs. NXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	30.76%	4.63%	3.60%
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)	32.43%	9.19%	-2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EMAX.TO and NXF.TO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024	0.87

The correlation between EMAX.TO and NXF.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMAX.TO vs. NXF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMAX.TO	NXF.TO
Energy	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EMAX.TO vs. NXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMAX.TO

EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 70
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

NXF.TO

NXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 73
NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
NXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
NXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
NXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
NXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMAX.TO vs. NXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMAX.TO	NXF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.36	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	3.03	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.38	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.90	4.90	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.55	13.97	-1.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMAX.TO vs. NXF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMAX.TO and NXF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMAX.TO	NXF.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.36	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.22	+0.51

Drawdowns

EMAX.TO vs. NXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.55%, smaller than the maximum NXF.TO drawdown of -65.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMAX.TO and NXF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMAX.TO	NXF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.55%	-65.25%	+37.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.39%	-9.41%	-2.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.72%	-5.01%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.31%	-16.04%	+6.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.85%	3.30%	+0.55%

Volatility

EMAX.TO vs. NXF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO) have volatilities of 7.47% and 7.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMAX.TO	NXF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.47%	7.55%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.32%	15.65%	-0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.03%	19.57%	+0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.41%	23.39%	-0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.41%	26.16%	-3.75%

Dividends

EMAX.TO vs. NXF.TO - Dividend Comparison

EMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.25%, more than NXF.TO's 8.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	10.25%	13.44%	12.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)	8.04%	7.70%	8.50%	8.60%	11.22%	9.48%	11.23%	7.83%	9.38%	6.50%	8.24%	8.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMAX.TO and NXF.TO in my portfolio?

EMAX.TO and NXF.TO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between EMAX.TO and NXF.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and CI.