PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMAX.TO vs. HXE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMAX.TO vs. HXE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMAX.TO vs. HXE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMAX.TO
Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
28.41%4.63%3.60%
HXE.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF
36.24%17.30%17.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMAX.TO achieves a 28.41% return, which is significantly lower than HXE.TO's 36.24% return.


EMAX.TO

1D
-3.02%
1M
6.45%
YTD
28.41%
6M
28.44%
1Y
27.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HXE.TO

1D
-3.74%
1M
9.25%
YTD
36.24%
6M
44.54%
1Y
53.17%
3Y*
25.64%
5Y*
32.28%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMAX.TO vs. HXE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HXE.TO's 0.27% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMAX.TO vs. HXE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMAX.TO
EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

HXE.TO
HXE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMAX.TO vs. HXE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMAX.TOHXE.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

1.96

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

2.43

-1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

2.63

-1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.42

9.28

-5.86

EMAX.TO vs. HXE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMAX.TO and HXE.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMAX.TOHXE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.96

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.21

+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between EMAX.TO and HXE.TO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EMAX.TO vs. HXE.TO - Dividend Comparison

EMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.44%, while HXE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

EMAX.TO vs. HXE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.55%, smaller than the maximum HXE.TO drawdown of -85.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMAX.TO and HXE.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMAX.TOHXE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.55%

-85.92%

+58.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.97%

-20.40%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.45%

-4.72%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.51%

-31.17%

+21.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.04%

5.77%

+2.27%

Volatility

EMAX.TO vs. HXE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) is 6.10%, while Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that EMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMAX.TOHXE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

7.42%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

15.06%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.45%

27.28%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.19%

29.07%

-6.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.19%

33.66%

-11.47%