EMAX.TO vs. EBNK.TO

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

EMAX.TO (Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and EBNK.TO (Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD) are both exchange-traded funds - EMAX.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while EBNK.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Evolve. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EMAX.TO returned 35.83% vs 36.44% for EBNK.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMAX.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EBNK.TO.

Performance

EMAX.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) and Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMAX.TO achieves a 27.45% return, which is significantly higher than EBNK.TO's 14.12% return.

EMAX.TO

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 21.90%
• YTD: 27.45%
• 1Y: 35.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EBNK.TO

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 5.66%
• 6M: 10.88%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 1Y: 36.44%
• 3Y*: 36.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMAX.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	27.45%	4.63%	3.73%
EBNK.TO Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD	14.12%	60.13%	28.51%

Correlation

The correlation between EMAX.TO and EBNK.TO is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2024	0.05

The correlation between EMAX.TO and EBNK.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMAX.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMAX.TO	EBNK.TO
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EMAX.TO vs. EBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMAX.TO

EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 64
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

EBNK.TO

EBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 64
EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
EBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
EBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMAX.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) and Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMAX.TO	EBNK.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.75	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.41	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.29	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	2.46	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.48	8.83	-1.36

EMAX.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMAX.TO and EBNK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMAX.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.55%, smaller than the maximum EBNK.TO drawdown of -31.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMAX.TO and EBNK.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMAX.TO	EBNK.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.55%	-31.02%	+3.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.39%	-14.87%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.16%	-0.87%	-5.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.27%	-7.28%	-1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.82%	4.14%	+0.68%

Volatility

EMAX.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) at 5.49%. This indicates that EMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMAX.TO	EBNK.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.40%	5.49%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.67%	17.65%	-1.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.06%	20.97%	-0.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.38%	26.76%	-4.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.38%	26.76%	-4.38%

EMAX.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EBNK.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMAX.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

EMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than EBNK.TO's 10.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EBNK.TO Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD	10.23%	11.05%	12.56%	7.32%	7.52%
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	10.52%	13.44%	12.31%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMAX.TO and EBNK.TO in my portfolio?

EMAX.TO and EBNK.TO have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMAX.TO or EBNK.TO?

On fees, EBNK.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMAX.TO or EBNK.TO?

EBNK.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMAX.TO.

What is the main difference between EMAX.TO and EBNK.TO?

EMAX.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while EBNK.TO is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EMAX.TO and 0.60% for EBNK.TO.