EMAU.L vs. DRGN.L
EMAU.L (L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and DRGN.L (L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. EMAU.L is passively managed, while DRGN.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMAU.L returned 6.29%/yr vs 4.53%/yr for DRGN.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMAU.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DRGN.L.
Performance
EMAU.L vs. DRGN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMAU.L achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN.L's 3.18% return.
EMAU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.57%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRGN.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 6.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- —
EMAU.L vs. DRGN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMAU.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.29% | 8.06% | 5.68% | 6.84% | -11.34% | -1.23% |
DRGN.L L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF | 3.18% | 5.48% | 3.14% | 0.48% | -5.41% | 3.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMAU.L and DRGN.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMAU.L vs. DRGN.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMAU.L
DRGN.L
EMAU.L vs. DRGN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAU.L) and L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMAU.L | DRGN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.40 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 4.37 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 14.98 | -5.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMAU.L vs. DRGN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMAU.L drawdown since its inception was -19.62%, which is greater than DRGN.L's maximum drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMAU.L and DRGN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMAU.L | DRGN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.62% | -11.78% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.55% | -1.46% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.01% | -3.47% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.86% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -3.57% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 0.43% | +0.14% |
Volatility
EMAU.L vs. DRGN.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAU.L) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF (DRGN.L) at 0.79%. This indicates that EMAU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRGN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMAU.L | DRGN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 0.79% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 3.11% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 3.50% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.58% | 4.65% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.58% | 4.58% | +1.00% |
EMAU.L vs. DRGN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMAU.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMAU.L vs. DRGN.L - Dividend Comparison
EMAU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRGN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGN.L L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF | 0.87% | 1.94% | 2.31% | 2.45% | 2.77% | 1.43% |
EMAU.L L&G Emerging Markets Corporate Bond (USD) Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMAU.L and DRGN.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRGN.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRGN.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EMAU.L.
They also come from different issuers: L&G and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EMAU.L and 0.30% for DRGN.L.
Find the right allocation for EMAU.L and DRGN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer