EMAS.L vs. V3AA.DE
EMAS.L (SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF) and V3AA.DE (Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EMAS.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while V3AA.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Choice Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMAS.L returned 15.70%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for V3AA.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMAS.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for V3AA.DE.
Performance
EMAS.L vs. V3AA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMAS.L is traded in GBP, while V3AA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the V3AA.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMAS.L achieves a 81.21% return, which is significantly higher than V3AA.DE's 11.89% return.
EMAS.L
- 1D
- 38.70%
- 1M
- 51.83%
- YTD
- 81.21%
- 6M
- 83.22%
- 1Y
- 120.08%
- 3Y*
- 35.88%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 15.67%
V3AA.DE
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 30.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- —
EMAS.L vs. V3AA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMAS.L SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF | 81.21% | 22.99% | 12.85% | 0.63% | -12.26% | -4.77% |
V3AA.DE Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 11.89% | 13.20% | 18.99% | 18.22% | -13.55% | 17.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMAS.L and V3AA.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.61 |
The correlation between EMAS.L and V3AA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMAS.L vs. V3AA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMAS.L
V3AA.DE
EMAS.L vs. V3AA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (EMAS.L) and Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (V3AA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMAS.L | V3AA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.09 | 1.47 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.86 | 3.77 | +7.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.47 | 15.13 | +20.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMAS.L | V3AA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.56 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.81 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.86 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
EMAS.L vs. V3AA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMAS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, which is greater than V3AA.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMAS.L and V3AA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMAS.L | V3AA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -20.41% | -14.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -8.11% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.88% | -20.41% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.16% | -20.41% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.64% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.69% | -4.81% | -6.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 2.02% | +1.40% |
Volatility
EMAS.L vs. V3AA.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (EMAS.L) has a higher volatility of 33.13% compared to Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (V3AA.DE) at 3.76%. This indicates that EMAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V3AA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMAS.L | V3AA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.13% | 3.76% | +29.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.88% | 8.99% | +26.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.40% | 11.95% | +30.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 14.03% | +10.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 14.00% | +8.18% |
EMAS.L vs. V3AA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMAS.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than V3AA.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMAS.L vs. V3AA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMAS.L nor V3AA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMAS.L and V3AA.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, V3AA.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
V3AA.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMAS.L.
EMAS.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while V3AA.DE is Global Equities. EMAS.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while V3AA.DE tracks FTSE Global All Cap Choice Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EMAS.L and 0.24% for V3AA.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMAS.L and V3AA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer