EMAD.L vs. UB20.L
EMAD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and UB20.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - EMAD.L tracks the MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Asia Index while UB20.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMAD.L returned 9.69%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for UB20.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMAD.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for UB20.L.
Performance
EMAD.L vs. UB20.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMAD.L is traded in USD, while UB20.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UB20.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMAD.L achieves a 21.59% return, which is significantly higher than UB20.L's 11.61% return. Over the past 10 years, EMAD.L has outperformed UB20.L with an annualized return of 9.69%, while UB20.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.61% annualized return.
EMAD.L
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -8.90%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- YTD
- 21.59%
- 1Y
- 36.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
UB20.L
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 17.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
EMAD.L vs. UB20.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMAD.L State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 21.59% | 32.13% | 11.12% | 6.54% | -21.75% | -6.15% | 28.24% | 16.78% | -14.40% | 42.49% |
UB20.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 11.61% | 20.45% | 5.20% | 5.17% | -5.99% | 4.34% | 6.69% | 18.67% | -10.89% | 25.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMAD.L and UB20.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2012 | 0.70 |
The correlation between EMAD.L and UB20.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMAD.L vs. UB20.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMAD.L
UB20.L
EMAD.L vs. UB20.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMAD.L | UB20.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.23 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 1.95 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 5.48 | +2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMAD.L vs. UB20.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMAD.L drawdown since its inception was -46.17%, which is greater than UB20.L's maximum drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMAD.L and UB20.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMAD.L | UB20.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.17% | -38.44% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -8.89% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.03% | -19.32% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.17% | -24.36% | -14.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.17% | -38.44% | -7.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.48% | -0.79% | -10.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.72% | -7.91% | -6.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 3.16% | +1.34% |
Volatility
EMAD.L vs. UB20.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMAD.L) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) at 3.14%. This indicates that EMAD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UB20.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMAD.L | UB20.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 3.14% | +6.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.14% | 11.21% | +9.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.53% | 13.59% | +9.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 17.11% | +3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 17.51% | +2.64% |
EMAD.L vs. UB20.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMAD.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than UB20.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMAD.L vs. UB20.L - Dividend Comparison
EMAD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UB20.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMAD.L State Street SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UB20.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 2.87% | 3.86% | 3.26% | 3.96% | 3.66% | 2.60% | 3.05% | 4.08% | 4.33% | 3.43% | 4.00% | 5.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMAD.L and UB20.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UB20.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UB20.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMAD.L.
EMAD.L tracks MSCI EM (Emerging Markets) Asia Index, while UB20.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EMAD.L and 0.30% for UB20.L.
Find the right allocation for EMAD.L and UB20.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer