PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMA5.DE vs. 36B1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMA5.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMA5.DE having a 2.33% return and 36B1.DE slightly higher at 2.43%.


EMA5.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.09%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
5.12%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*

36B1.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
1.52%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.12%
1Y
7.79%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMA5.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMA5.DE
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
2.33%-2.57%14.01%3.79%-5.07%7.86%-1.26%
36B1.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
2.43%-0.10%10.86%5.55%-13.71%6.46%-0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between EMA5.DE and 36B1.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.75

The correlation between EMA5.DE and 36B1.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMA5.DE vs. 36B1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMA5.DE
EMA5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

36B1.DE
36B1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
36B1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMA5.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMA5.DE36B1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.25

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.63

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

6.72

-3.25

EMA5.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the 36B1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMA5.DE and 36B1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMA5.DE36B1.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

1.32

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.26

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.23

+0.24

Drawdowns

EMA5.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMA5.DE drawdown since its inception was -10.01%, smaller than the maximum 36B1.DE drawdown of -22.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA5.DE and 36B1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMA5.DE36B1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-22.46%

+12.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-2.95%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.01%

-12.43%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.01%

-16.34%

+6.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-1.33%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-8.64%

+5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.16%

+0.06%

Volatility

EMA5.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.25% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) at 1.21%. This indicates that EMA5.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36B1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMA5.DE36B1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

1.21%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.23%

3.81%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.86%

5.87%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.07%

8.41%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.94%

9.55%

-2.61%

EMA5.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMA5.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than 36B1.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMA5.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Dividend Comparison

EMA5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than 36B1.DE's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36B1.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
4.93%5.22%4.96%5.09%5.00%4.57%3.40%4.19%
EMA5.DE
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
4.59%5.61%5.39%4.22%2.89%1.01%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMA5.DE and 36B1.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMA5.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMA5.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for 36B1.DE.

EMA5.DE tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity, while 36B1.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EMA5.DE and 0.45% for 36B1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMA5.DE and 36B1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer