PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELLE.L vs. SBUY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELLE.L vs. SBUY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ELLE.L is traded in USD, while SBUY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SBUY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELLE.L achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than SBUY.L's 6.22% return.


ELLE.L

1D
0.64%
1M
1.05%
YTD
3.85%
6M
6.42%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*

SBUY.L

1D
0.94%
1M
0.81%
YTD
6.22%
6M
9.15%
1Y
24.08%
3Y*
21.69%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELLE.L vs. SBUY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ELLE.L
Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF
3.85%20.47%9.34%17.89%-16.59%17.73%12.70%6.75%
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
6.22%30.78%12.73%15.23%-11.50%20.26%11.75%10.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ELLE.L and SBUY.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019

0.31

Over the past year, ELLE.L and SBUY.L have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ELLE.L vs. SBUY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ELLE.L
SBUY.L

Financial Services

22.5%
32.9%

Healthcare

15.2%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

10.5%
1.9%

Communication Services

9.9%
4.1%

Utilities

7.0%
2.2%

Industrials

6.9%
11.0%

Technology

6.2%
7.6%

Real Estate

5.2%
0.5%

Basic Materials

4.7%
1.4%

Energy

-

17.1%

Financial Services

ELLE.L
22.5%
SBUY.L
32.9%

Healthcare

ELLE.L
15.2%
SBUY.L
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ELLE.L
12.0%
SBUY.L
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

ELLE.L
10.5%
SBUY.L
1.9%

Communication Services

ELLE.L
9.9%
SBUY.L
4.1%

Utilities

ELLE.L
7.0%
SBUY.L
2.2%

Industrials

ELLE.L
6.9%
SBUY.L
11.0%

Technology

ELLE.L
6.2%
SBUY.L
7.6%

Real Estate

ELLE.L
5.2%
SBUY.L
0.5%

Basic Materials

ELLE.L
4.7%
SBUY.L
1.4%

Energy

ELLE.L

-

SBUY.L
17.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELLE.L vs. SBUY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELLE.L
ELLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ELLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SBUY.L
SBUY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELLE.L vs. SBUY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ELLE.LSBUY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.37

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.40

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

11.50

-5.67

ELLE.L vs. SBUY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELLE.L and SBUY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ELLE.LSBUY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

2.13

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.62

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.69

+0.36

Drawdowns

ELLE.L vs. SBUY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELLE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.65%, smaller than the maximum SBUY.L drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELLE.L and SBUY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELLE.LSBUY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.65%

-38.71%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-7.06%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.63%

-16.45%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.65%

-27.07%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-0.41%

-2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-5.78%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.09%

+0.53%

Volatility

ELLE.L vs. SBUY.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) at 2.96%. This indicates that ELLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELLE.LSBUY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

2.96%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

8.43%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

11.28%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.11%

15.86%

+9.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.22%

16.80%

+12.42%

ELLE.L vs. SBUY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELLE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SBUY.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ELLE.L vs. SBUY.L - Dividend Comparison

ELLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ELLE.L
Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
1.69%1.86%1.80%1.73%1.91%1.20%1.62%1.90%1.31%1.22%1.60%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


ELLE.L and SBUY.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ELLE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ELLE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ELLE.L and 0.39% for SBUY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELLE.L and SBUY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer