PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELLE.L vs. INFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELLE.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ELLE.L is traded in USD, while INFR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INFR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELLE.L achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly lower than INFR.L's 9.25% return.


ELLE.L

1D
0.64%
1M
1.05%
YTD
3.85%
6M
6.42%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*

INFR.L

1D
-1.19%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
9.25%
6M
9.24%
1Y
15.19%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELLE.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ELLE.L
Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF
3.85%20.47%9.34%17.89%-16.59%17.73%12.70%6.75%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
9.25%13.90%9.63%0.06%-5.54%18.46%-1.78%10.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ELLE.L and INFR.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019

0.22

The correlation between ELLE.L and INFR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ELLE.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ELLE.L
INFR.L

Financial Services

22.5%
0.0%

Healthcare

15.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.5%

-

Communication Services

9.9%
1.0%

Utilities

7.0%
56.0%

Industrials

6.9%
20.8%

Technology

6.2%
0.7%

Real Estate

5.2%
5.0%

Basic Materials

4.7%

-

Energy

-

16.4%

Financial Services

ELLE.L
22.5%
INFR.L
0.0%

Healthcare

ELLE.L
15.2%
INFR.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

ELLE.L
12.0%
INFR.L

-

Consumer Defensive

ELLE.L
10.5%
INFR.L

-

Communication Services

ELLE.L
9.9%
INFR.L
1.0%

Utilities

ELLE.L
7.0%
INFR.L
56.0%

Industrials

ELLE.L
6.9%
INFR.L
20.8%

Technology

ELLE.L
6.2%
INFR.L
0.7%

Real Estate

ELLE.L
5.2%
INFR.L
5.0%

Basic Materials

ELLE.L
4.7%
INFR.L

-

Energy

ELLE.L

-

INFR.L
16.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELLE.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELLE.L
ELLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ELLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELLE.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ELLE.LINFR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

2.95

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

8.36

-2.54

ELLE.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELLE.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ELLE.LINFR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.44

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.47

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.32

+0.73

Drawdowns

ELLE.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELLE.L drawdown since its inception was -27.65%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -48.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELLE.L and INFR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELLE.LINFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.65%

-48.40%

+20.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-5.13%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.63%

-14.58%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.65%

-21.88%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-3.68%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-9.57%

+4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.81%

+0.81%

Volatility

ELLE.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELLE.LINFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

3.57%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

8.67%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

10.51%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.11%

13.70%

+11.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.22%

14.79%

+14.43%

ELLE.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELLE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ELLE.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

ELLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ELLE.L
Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.82%2.97%2.96%3.02%2.54%2.60%2.84%2.70%2.99%3.51%3.45%4.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


ELLE.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ELLE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ELLE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

ELLE.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. ELLE.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ELLE.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELLE.L and INFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer