PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ELLE.L vs. HKOD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ELLE.L vs. HKOD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L) and HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELLE.L achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than HKOD.L's 70.37% return.


ELLE.L

1D
0.53%
1M
1.76%
6M
5.32%
YTD
7.11%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
14.16%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*

HKOD.L

1D
-1.67%
1M
-20.60%
6M
52.67%
YTD
70.37%
1Y
138.83%
3Y*
37.85%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
14.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELLE.L vs. HKOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ELLE.L
Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF
7.11%22.83%7.33%17.09%-15.57%15.95%10.40%25.70%-9.57%2.95%
HKOD.L
HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF
70.37%99.54%-22.90%19.95%-28.44%-8.49%45.08%10.64%-21.06%5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ELLE.L and HKOD.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2017

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between ELLE.L and HKOD.L has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ELLE.L vs. HKOD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELLE.L
ELLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ELLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

HKOD.L
HKOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HKOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELLE.L vs. HKOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L) and HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ELLE.LHKOD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

5.77

-3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

17.93

-11.07

ELLE.L vs. HKOD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the HKOD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELLE.L and HKOD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ELLE.L vs. HKOD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELLE.L drawdown since its inception was -37.15%, smaller than the maximum HKOD.L drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELLE.L and HKOD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELLE.LHKOD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.15%

-50.54%

+13.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-24.00%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.65%

-29.48%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.01%

-47.65%

+19.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-24.00%

+24.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-18.79%

+12.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

7.75%

-5.09%

Volatility

ELLE.L vs. HKOD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF (ELLE.L) is 3.33%, while HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L) has a volatility of 20.20%. This indicates that ELLE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HKOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELLE.LHKOD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

20.20%

-16.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

41.23%

-31.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.79%

45.10%

-33.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

29.74%

-14.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

26.96%

-10.42%

ELLE.L vs. HKOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELLE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HKOD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ELLE.L vs. HKOD.L - Dividend Comparison

ELLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HKOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ELLE.L
Lyxor Index Fund - Lyxor Global Gender Equality (DR) Ucits ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HKOD.L
HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF
0.43%0.68%1.54%1.08%0.72%0.61%0.02%0.29%0.56%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ELLE.L and HKOD.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ELLE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ELLE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HKOD.L.

ELLE.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while HKOD.L tracks HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ELLE.L and 0.50% for HKOD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ELLE.L and HKOD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer